Order Number |
653456787665478 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY/DISERTATION |
Writer Level |
PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED |
Format |
APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD |
Academic Sources |
10 -20 |
Page Count |
4-8 PAGES |
Legal and Ethical Considerations and Issues
Choose a health care issue with controversial ethical and legal implications that was at the center of a high visibility case in the public domain.
I choose- Patient Abuse
Note: There is no time frame during which the case must have occurred for this assignment. Please note, however, that any case selected must be analyzed in the context of laws and policies that existed at the time of the case in addition to current laws and policies. Perform research in the University library using at least 8–10 relevant peer-reviewed academic or professional journal articles that were published within the past 5 years, and complete the following to prepare your report: Analyze the ethics of the case from each end of the ethical spectrum (ultraconservative to ultraliberal) from the perspective of 3 of the following stakeholders: Patient, Patient’s immediate family or guardians Emergency medical personnel or first responders Doctors, surgeons, specialists, or other medical providers The hospital or health care facility A pharmaceutical or medical device company Identify policies at the federal, state, and local levels relating to the provision of health care and patient rights that played the following roles in the case: Assesses opposing views of these policies from the perspectives of the provider and patient Analyzes the implications of these policies on the operations of health care organizations Identify at least 3 state or federal laws that are relevant to the case, and complete the following: Evaluate key legal factors that are inherent in the case. Assess various policies and procedures that are inherent in these laws that relate to the provision of health care by providers or patient rights. Differentiate between the demands of legal policies and ethical issues with relevance to the needs of the provider and patient. Formulate an assessment of the potential impact of the case on decision-making options in the future for providers, patients, and administrators.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/
Legal and Ethical Considerations and Issues