Order Number |
6537543236456854 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY/DISERTATION |
Writer Level |
PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED |
Format |
APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD |
Academic Sources |
10 -20 |
Page Count |
4-8 PAGES |
Leadership Personality Profiles
PAPER: LEADERSHIP PERSONALITY PROFILES ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW Each Paper Assignment is designed to help you make application of course content to leadership and its theory. Review the Learn material, determine the key issues presented, provide diagnostic impressions based upon, and develop recommendations and or conclusions as needed/required. Provide a rationale for your diagnostic impressions using criteria from the module, also including career experience. The goal is to present, in writing, the basis for your diagnostic impressions.
Scenario:
I think Elon Musk would be fairly easy to use.
Select a present or past leader, and describe his or her personality profile using each of the Big Five Model of Personality dimensions. After rating each dimension as strong, moderate, or weak, give an example of traits and typical behavior of the leader for each dimension. Explain which dimensions are strongest and weakest and why you see them that way?
I will also upload an example paper as to what is being looked for.
The textbook being used is Leadership: Theory, Application & Skill Development 6th
Edition (Lussier & Achua)
I can scan in the section in the textbook if needed.
INSTRUCTIONS
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/
Leadership Personality Profiles