LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PLAN

February 9, 2023

LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Building on your learning in this course, you will create a Personal Leadership Development Plan. The plan will be written in an academic paper format, however, it can incorporate tables, bullets, visual models, etc. using formatting different from APA. This will be a 5-7 page paper.

Begin by identifying at least three areas in which you want to grow as a leader. For each area, identify the skill, knowledge, or practice you want to develop and then create a plan to develop this skill/knowledge. Be sure your plan is SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Timely).

You may choose to use the principles of Servant Leadership, Covey’s “Seven Habits” or “Sharpening the Saw” or Brown’s (2018) 16 elements of “Daring Leadership” as a framework for your plan. In your plan, be sure to discuss how your goals relate to a leadership theory.

Your paper should include the following:

Introduction: ½ to 1 page

Theoretical Perspective: 1 page

Three Areas of Growth (including SMART goal and plan to achieve each goal): 3-5 pages

Conclusion: ½ to page

Bibliography: 1 page

References from the course:

Brown, B. (2018). Dare to lead: Brave work, tough conversations, whole hearts. New York, NY: Random House. ISBN 9780399592522
Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and practice, Eighth Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Rowe, G. W & Guerrero, L. (2018) Cases in Leadership, Fourth Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN 978-1-4833-8326-2

Expectation:

My Paper is an exemplar of language and conventions used in scholarly literature. Writing is well-organized and free of errors in grammar or composition. All resources are appropriately cited. No errors in APA format.

Includes a detailed synopsis of the framework for the personal leadership plan. Discusses specific ways in which the chosen framework aligns with the chosen theory. Includes a visual model that incorporates the framework with the leadership theory.
Includes a strong analysis of four areas for growth that closely relate to the chosen leadership development framework. Includes a SMART plan for each area of growth, effectively incorporating literature throughout to support the plan. The plan will effectively lead to growth in each area.
Makes a focused, cohesive, logical and compelling academic argument. Paper is effectively organized and includes an introduction, body, and conclusion. Transitions between sections and ideas are clear, and build on each other.
Integrates references to support claims and assertions made in the paper, effectively synthesizing different perspectives and research results from scholarly sources.

[Order Now]

LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PLAN

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.