Layers Palette Discussion Case Study Essay Paper

Order Number

Type of Project

ESSAY

Writer Level

PHD VERIFIED

Format

APA

Academic Sources

10

Page Count

3-12 PAGES

9.1: Students submit an URL to an image which consists of parts of at least 3 other images with a description what they did and what sources they used. This assignment refers to small parts of images. Students may take one picture as the “main background” and then add “small images” from other pictures to it as they fit in.

9.2 Students hand in an URL to an image which should be a combination of two complete photos with a description of what they did and what sources they used. This assignment refers to two complete pictures, for example an ocean and the skyline of Chicago, a photo of the countryside and a photo of a modern car.

The difference is that in the first assignment students have one “main image” to which they add small parts from other images. In the second assignment students combine two images with almost equal proportions of both images. Both assignments are a good “creative exercise”, as they allow us to create “the unexpected”.

Please be aware that in three weeks you may hand in your final portfolio for this course. It may consist of 3 to 5 images you elaborated in this course with a detailed description what your artistic intention was and how you attended to quality criteria of art and digital photography.

As I mentioned: The first posting has to be 350 to 400 words long and discuss your ideas about the subtopic in detail. If requested by the assignment, it should contain links to your artwork.

The Module 9 Assignment that you submitted involves combining different images. Reflect upon this assignment. Your initial posting should at least be 300 words long.

[Order Now]

How do you feel about your work of art? Why do you think it constitutes art? What do you want to express? Where are the difficulties in working with layers and how do you solve them? What components of this creative process can you identify and describe? How did engaging in this process affect your perception of the world?

95-100%

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

91-84  points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

50-85%

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

0-45%

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.