Laws of the Romans History Paper

December 6, 2022

Laws of the Romans History Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Laws of the Romans History Paper

[Order Now]

What do the laws found in the Twelve Tables tell us about what Rome was like in the fifth century BCE? What kind of society do they reflect?

What qualities did Pliny believe characterized a loyal Roman subject? How did this understanding influence Pliny’s criticisms of Christians and his justification for punishing them?

Based on the assigned Crash Course World History video assigned for this module, why did people become Christians in the first centuries CE? According to Eusebius, why did Constantine become a Christian? How are these reasons similar to or different from how and why people might become Christians today?

What did Eusebius think made a good ruler? What did he think made a bad ruler?

Specs for discussion forum answers:

Length: 100 words per answer

Quotations: No more than 5 words can be quoted in your combined discussion forum answers and replies for the entire module

Content: Thorough grasp of assigned materials, thoughtful reflection on discussion questions, and specific details from assigned materials to support each answer

Completion: Only answers found in your first post in each discussion forum will be graded

Plagiarism: Both paraphrasing plagiarism and outside source plagiarism will result in a zero

Grammar: A good-faith effort to write in complete sentences with proper spelling, capitalization, and punctuation

Subject line: last name, module X

Formatting: Each question answered in a separate paragraph, in the order which the questions are listed. See requirements handout for details on what you need to do if you are cutting and pasting your answers from another file into Blackboard.

[Order Now]

Specs for discussion forum replies:

Length: 3 academically substantive sentences

Quotations: No more than 5 words can be quoted in your combined discussion forum answers and replies for the entire module

Content: Each reply must contribute a new and academically substantive idea, focusing on a single discussion forum answer offered by a classmate

Distribution: Each reply must be in response to a different one of the discussion questions. Each reply must be on a thread created by a different classmate

Tone: Replies must be courteous and respectful

Plagiarism: Both paraphrasing plagiarism and outside source plagiarism will result in a zero

Grammar: A good-faith effort to write in complete sentences with proper spelling, capitalization, and punctuation

Laws of the Romans History Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.