Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Overview
The issue of sanctuary cities in the United States presents an interesting case in jurisdiction. In this assignment, you will review sources that present a specific case of sanctuary cities in the United States and complete a template that outlines the main components of the conflict. Planning and developing prototypes are an important professional skill, and this will help to illustrate connections between law enforcement, court systems, and cases, and how they function together.
Prompt
In Module Two, you learned about how law enforcement functions; in Module Three, you learned about the courts. This assignment will assist you as you begin to create presentation materials for Project Two. Complete the template using the provided Module Four Assignment Template Word Document.
Use this document to illustrate the specific functions and processes of law enforcement and court systems, as well as how they work together in a specific case. Following the template, you will find a few follow-up questions. Answer each question in two to five sentences, and use examples from the resources to support your responses. These should elaborate on the information presented in your template.
Law Enforcement
Identify the functions of law enforcement related to sanctuary cities in the resources provided. Be sure to include the following:
What law enforcement does
The jurisdictional issues related to law enforcement and sanctuary cities
Courts
Identify the functions of court systems related to sanctuary cities in the resources provided. Be sure to include the following:
What the courts do
The jurisdictional issues related to courts and sanctuary cities
Function Together
Describe how the U.S. law enforcement and court systems relate to sanctuary cities using information from the resources provided. Be sure to include the following:
How they function together
At least one dysfunction or challenge area
Resources:
Textbook: Introduction to Criminal Justice Interactive eBook, Chapter 16, pp. 427–433
Article: Texas Banned ‘Sanctuary Cities.’ Some Police Departments Didn’t Get the Memo.
Video: A Day With ICE in the So-Called “Sanctuary City”
Specifically, the following rubric criteria must be addressed:
Identify functions of law enforcement, including their jurisdictions, related to sanctuary cities
Identify functions of court systems in the United States, including their jurisdictions, related to sanctuary cities
Describe how law enforcement and court systems function together within the U.S. criminal justice system
Guidelines for Submission
This assignment must be completed using the provided Module Four Assignment Template. Any references must be cited in APA format. For more information on citations, review the Shapiro Library APA Style Guide.
CJ 112 Module Four Assignment Template
Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information.
Functions and Processes Related to Sanctuary Cities
Law Enforcement | Courts | |
What They Do | [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |
Jurisdictional Issues | [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |
Describe how the U.S. law enforcement and court systems function together.
[Insert text.]
Include at least one dysfunction or challenge area.
[Insert text.]
Follow-Up Questions
Answer the questions below in two to five sentences in order to elaborate on the process represented in the graphic organizer above. Use examples from the article provided in the Module Four Assignment Guidelines and Rubric to support your responses.
In what ways did law enforcement and the court systems work together throughout the process in the article? Consider all steps of the process, from when an arrest is initially made to when a determination is made.
[Insert text.]
What jurisdictions did the court systems have? How did this inform the process and result?
[Insert text.]
Describe how the court system functioned in order to arrive at a decision in this case. What is the function of the court system, and what were the process steps that the court system followed?
[Insert text.]
References:
[Include any references in APA format.]
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/