Landing Gear Upgrade and WBS Schedule Project

December 3, 2022

Landing Gear Upgrade and WBS Schedule Project

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Landing Gear Upgrade and WBS Schedule Project

[Order Now]

Landing, Gear, Upgrade, WBS, Schedule, Project

Project -Landing Gear Upgrade

Create WBS Schedule page, enter data from your Project Proposal.

Print the reports by navigating to: [REPORT>Dashboards>Project Overview] as PDF

Draft an e-mail message as a Word document addressed to the project team. Your message should provide a high-level overview of key elements of your selected project topic: objectives, cost, duration, success measurements, and so forth. It will accompany the two reports: Project Overview and Work Overview Reports.

Create the Project Scope Statement following the guidelines found in the PMBOK^® Guide in Section 5 Project Scope Management

Using your Project Scope Statement, input your work packages into MS Project. 1.The WBS should be created in MS Project following standard indent and hanging indent practices used in WBS creation. The WBS and schedule must have proper grouping, indenting, and coding for approximately 25-to-40-line items.

Baseline Resource Plan:

Load resources and produce a baseline resource plan.

Review resources and Gantt chart.

Produce and print both reports as .pdf documents.

Overallocated Resources
Resource Overview Report

Complete a Cost Overview Report; go to [REPORT>Dashboards (click on the dropdown arrow)>Cost Overview]. Overallocated Resource, Resource Overview reports, and the Cost Overview Report:

2.Submit the Cost Overview Report as a .pdf document to the Dropbox using the proper filename convention.

3.Discuss how you balance the scope and budget, as the requirements you initially gathered will no doubt exceed your budget, and new priorities will have to be set (maximum of two paragraphs).

1.Complete your Network Diagram. Go to [TASK >Gantt Chart (click on the dropdown arrow)>Network Diagram] to determine if your project is logically sequenced and to ensure that you have captured your dependencies by linking the appropriate tasks.

Create a network diagram that captures the logical relationships, including dependencies.

1.Complete a Gantt chart depicting the critical path for the project.

2.Save this as a .pdf document, showing the critical tasks; go to [View>Gantt Chart>Format and then Filter, and select critical tasks]. See below.

In a narrative (at least two paragraphs), discuss how you balance scope and budget. As the requirements you initially gathered will no doubt exceed your budget, new priorities will have to be set. If your resources do not exceed your budget, then discuss what you did when developing your project plan to ensure this result.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Landing Gear Upgrade and WBS Schedule Project

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.