Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
INSTRUCTIONS:
For this assignment, you can’t USE ANY SOURCES FROM BLOG!!! ALL THE SOURCES MUST BE ACADEMIC SOURCES. The points which I circled in the screenshot are very important. I posted some pictures in the two files and a sample file which you need to use in this paper. Please go through the assignment instructions very carefully before you working on this order.
About 1200 words It should be!!
include the pictures which I uploaded in the two files!
The paper format which you need to follow is in the sample! use the example paper to guide
Own land recognition
Write your own land recognition. This can be of the campus, where you were born, where you grew up, a place that is simply special to you, or even the whole planet (which basically covers all of these aforementioned places). You might even write a land recognition for a place that you wish existed – Wakanda, Never Never Land, SpongeBob’s underwater reef… or a place that you make up, entirely of your own creation. The idea is to consider the relationship that you have to the land upon which you sit, sleep, walk, and breathe. (400 words minimum)
would you use groundwater or treated wastewater for irrigation and provide support for your choice
Imagine that you are a farmer that grows corn as a main crop and source of most of your income.
Assume that you have control over three potential uses for your corn crop which include:
Ethanol production
Livestock feed
Corn syrup
Which of the above uses would you choose for your corn? Provide at least 3 reasons to justify your choice. Provide at least one reason for not choosing either of the other alternatives.
If given the choice, would you use groundwater or treated wastewater for irrigation and provide support for your choice.
You have the choice to use either synthetic pesticides to increase crop yield or some non-synthetic alternative pest control method(s) that might not give the same crop yield (Refer to pages 299-300 in your textbook). Which would you choose and provide justification for your choice.
Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/