Kansas City Legacies Community Responses

 Kansas City Legacies Community Responses

Instructions/Descriptions

 Kansas City Legacies Community Responses

Please read and respond (in 300 words) to one of the Group A posts. Please discuss (following the above lecture) how similar or different Segal’s strategies are with respect to her paper’s introduction? How do you evaluate different elements in her introduction? How did she follow those arguments in the body paragraphs? How did he define her key concepts? How was his thesis? And how similar or different each of these elements might be compared to Shragge’s article analyzed by Group A students?

here is Group A students post….

An introduction is a crucial part of any paper as it gives a detailed background to the topic of the paper. A brief and focused introduction provides solid information and encourages the readers to continue on to the main parts of the paper. Therefore, Segal uses the introduction part to effectively introduce her topic and aims. Equally important, she uses it to give an overview of the paper. Moreover, she directs her subjects to efficiently organize her main ideas on empathy by stating what they would be about. In the evaluation of the elements in her introduction, Segal touches on every aspect of the introduction as follows.

[Order Now]

First, she uses an opening hook that catches the reader’s attention. The opening hook, therefore, makes the reader be more interested in reading the whole paper to get detailed information about the topic. Secondly, she gives relevant background information that the reader needs to know more about while reading through the paper. Thirdly, she brings up relevant examples of the main ideas that give the readers a better mental image of the topic. Having internalized the topic in mind, the reader can easily understand the point being made. Lastly, she gives an expository thesis which introduces a pattern of development for the readers to follow her paper. These elements are similar as compared to Group A students’ analysis of Segal’s work as they considered all the elements.

In her thesis, she states how she will briefly describe the subject of the relationship between interpersonal empathy and social empathy in the community. As she states in the thesis, she effectively, efficiently, argumentative, and concisely explains her subject in the main body. In her main body, Segal uses multiple paragraphs to provide a framework for organizing her ideas on empathy in a logical order. Additionally, the clear structure of the paragraphs guides the reader throughout the paper. She followed her arguments in the paragraphs by deeply explaining her ideas using scenarios and examples to strengthen her points, thus enhancing the fluency of the paper.  She defines the key concepts in her work by considering the context, background information, sense of scale and range as well as the importance of the key concept within the subject.

POST

[Order Now]

Shragge’s introduction is solid, the hook could use some work but since this reading is split up from his book it is understandable that he did not try and use a more interesting hook. Within the hook he also defines his argument which he believes that the legacies surrounding community organizing practices are very complex. Following up by quickly addressing why this is important and why people should care by stating this approach mixed with a critical social analysis has potential to be directed to progressive social change. He sets the stage with his main idea for the chapter by providing background information into his exploration in the community action approach by examining several perspectives. The first would be the work of Saul Alinsky, an American community organizer who popularized the method and strategies that go behind community organization. Next would be the discussion of the contribution of the North American New Left and the women’s movement with examples of contemporary community action in order to examine continuities and contradictions to such an approach. His main thesis was short simple and sweet followed by a great explanation of his arguments by breaking down his approach into main points that are individually addressed within the chapter in the order he addresses them in the introduction. This allows the reader to have continuity within the chapter creating a strong flow that is easy to follow. Shragge, E. (2013). The Legacy and Traditions of Social Action. In Activism and Social Change: Lessons for Community and Local Organizing (pp. 51–80). essay, University of Toronto Press.

Shragge’s introduction on the paper is what a beginning to a paper should do. It provides a short, brief exposition on the subject before getting straight to the point about what the chapter is about. Shragge orders the subjects to organize his ideas on the subject, stating on each what they would be about. When mentioning each section, Shragge also describes different sources and references he uses to back up each idea mentioned in the introduction. Along with this, Shragge also brings up specific instances of each idea to give the reader a better mental image on the subject in demonstration. Having a visual example of a concept can aid readers substantially to understand the premise of the point being made. His thesis states the subject of community action and explains how he will go about into describing and studying it. As mentioned, this thesis works very well with how brief and to the point it is with some background as to how it will be explained. In the paragraphs of the paper, Shragge uses a lot of scenarios and examples to strengthen the points being made that were mentioned in the introduction. For example, one of the topics in the intro about different perspectives on community action mentions the North American New Left’s contributions on the subject. Shragge makes contrasts between the New Left and older leftist ideologies in history to give the reader a better understanding on where this perspective stands in terms of societal views and contribution (Shragge, 60-61). In the paragraphs, Shragge would used words like “second” or “finally” to help the reader flow through the passages of the reading (Shragge, 62, 77). This gives an idea for readers at the beginning of each paragraph when an idea is being elaborated on, or when it jumps to a separate idea. Having organization backed up by the introduction’s elements play a key role in fluency of an essay. Shragge, E. (2013). The Legacy and Traditions of Social Action. In Activism and Social Change: Lessons for Community and Local Organizing (pp. 51–80). essay, University of Toronto Press.

 Kansas City Legacies Community Responses

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!