Judge Kavanaugh SeaWorld of Florida Discussion

December 3, 2022

Judge Kavanaugh SeaWorld of Florida Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

Judge Kavanaugh SeaWorld of Florida Discussion

In approximately 4 to 5 double-spaced typed pages, please do the following:

1)Summarize the facts of this case (about three paragraphs).

2)Summarize the law involved in the case (again, about three paragraphs): that is, state precisely and clearly what legal requirements must be proven in order to impose liability upon an employer for an accident in the workplace; also, describe any legal exceptions or defenses that are available which absolve an employer from liability. All the latter information is included in the case’s majority and dissenting opinions.

3)Summarize the majority opinion written by Judge Rogers of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in about one (1) page.

4)Summarize the dissenting opinion written by Judge Kavanaugh in about one (1) page.

5)Then, present your argument as to which opinion is more soundly written – the majority opinion or the dissenting opinion. Do this in approximately one (1) page. There is no right or wrong answer – both opinions have exceedingly valid arguments, but support your position with evidence. Which opinion is more effective and complete in applying the facts of the case to the law which governs employer liability? Point out the language in the opinions – either arguments which are particularly strong or arguments which you deem are weak or poorly supported. Finally, are there questions or arguments which you believe were inadequately covered by either the majority or the dissenting opinion? If so, what are they?

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Judge Kavanaugh SeaWorld of Florida Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.