- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 757 528 8682
- support@standardwriter.com
Janus vs AFSCME and Public Workers Comparative Essay
Janus vs AFSCME and Public Workers Comparative Essay
|
Order Number |
636738393092 |
|
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
|
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
|
Format |
APA |
|
Academic Sources |
10 |
|
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Instructions/Descriptions
Janus vs AFSCME and Public Workers Comparative Essay
The Supreme Court of the United States heard the arguments in the case of Janus vs. AFSCME. This case was argued before SCOTUS in 2018. Your Term Project is to
Research aspects of the case; Janus vs. AFSCME.
1) Know the type of union being discussed. Detail the advantages and disadvantages of this type of union membership.
2) Determine the benefits and challenges for each side, Janus and AFSCME.
3) Understand and explain how the Abood vs. Detroit Board of Education, established a law which maintained precedence since 1977.
4) Research and discuss any additional historically cases which have challenged or supported the 1977 decision.
5) From your research and course learnings determine which side, Janus or AFSCME you support. Do you agree or disagree with the courts decision in the case, why or why not?
Your term project is to prepare arguments in defense of your chosen side, Janus or AFSCME. Detail whether the Abood vs. Detroit Board of Education law should have been upheld or overturned. What would be the impacts of upholding the 1977 decision? What are the impacts of overturning the 1977 law? Chose the side based on your own beliefs, which may not align with the courts rulings.
This is the final project for this course. Therefore, your Term Project should demonstrate a mastery of the complete coursework during the semester. Additionally, the project should be a reflection of your own original work. It should not contain more than a 30% similarity with Turn It In. Failure to submit your own original work will result in failure.
Paper should be 3-4 pages (not including reference page) typed and double spaced utilizing 12 point font. Sources must be cited.
Attached as Word document.
Rubric
HRPO 1305 (1)
| HRPO 1305 (1) | ||||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionIntroduction of topic to be discussed. Ability to grab readers attention. Provide thesis statement |
|
5.0 pts | ||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistorical Application of the CaseBackground information – 1) thoroughness and accuracy of research 2) Demonstrate understating of complexity of facts and ability to relay facts in organized format |
|
10.0 pts | ||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArgument1) Detailed supporting or opposing position. Effectively detail reason for your stance 2) Historical view and future implications 3) Clarity of argument |
|
25.0 pts | ||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionEffectively summarize discussed points Clear reflection of thesis statement |
|
5.0 pts | ||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationReadability, overall clarity, proper use of grammar, and use of citations |
|
5.0 pts | ||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationThe project should represent your original work. It should not contain more than a 30% similarity with Turn It In. Failure to submit your own original work will result in failure. | ||||
Janus vs AFSCME and Public Workers Comparative Essay
| RUBRIC | |||
| Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
| Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
| Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Janus vs AFSCME and Public Workers Comparative Essay
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow /
Janus vs AFSCME and Public Workers Comparative Essay
