Investigations and Prosecutions Reflection Paper

December 16, 2022

Investigations and Prosecutions Reflection Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Investigations and Prosecutions Reflection Paper

Investigations, Prosecutions, Reflection, Paper

After you have completed all of the assignments in this unit, write a 300–500-word reflection journal on what you have learned and what questions you may still have.

Investigations and Prosecutions

Illegal Insider Trading refers generally to buying or selling a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security. Insider trading violations may also include “tipping” such information, securities trading by the person “tipped,” and securities trading by those who misappropriate such information.

Resource:

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (n.d.). Insider trading . http://www.sec.gov/answers/insider.htm

For this assignment, you will assess and evaluate the challenges of the investigation and prosecution of white-collar and specialized criminals and provide an in-depth review of each challenge in a 3–5 page paper (excluding cover page) responding to the following:

Focus on the complex criminal investigation of insider trading.
Research the prosecutions of those caught committing those acts.
Examine the federal statute on insider trading.
Does the language of the statute itself help explain why Martha Stewart was not charged with insider trading?
Include practical, detailed examples to support your positions.

Please Note: This assignment will require outside research.

Provide a minimum of two credible sources outside the text to support your positions, and discuss how you evaluated the credibility of the resources used. You may consult the Library, the internet, the textbook, other course material, and any other outside resources in supporting your task, using proper citations in APA style.

The paper should contain a cover page and a list of references in APA format. All pages of text should be double-spaced and in 12 point font.

Topic 1: Case Study: Securities Fraud- 1 PAGE

The Treasury Department wants the Securities and Exchange Commission to impose more consistent standards and greater accountability for those who provide advice to average investors.

After reading the information about securities fraud, answer the following questions: What do you think of this legislation? Do you think it would help prevent securities fraud? Why or why not? Provide examples to support your position.

Topic 2: Pension Fraud—- 1 PAGE

After reading the information on pension fraud, discuss the concept of pension fraud and discuss the ways that law enforcement can fight this type of fraud. Provide examples to support your position.

Topic 3: Insider Trading

Go to the following website and take a short quiz on insider trading. After taking the quiz, did you discover anything about inside trading that surprised you? If so, what was it?

Quiz: Are you an insider? https://money.cnn.com/quizzes/2010/fortune/are_you_an_insider/

Reference:

Tseng, Nin-Hai. (2021). Are you an insider? CNN Money. http://money.cnn.com/quizzes/2010/fortune/are_you_an_insider/

[Order Now]

Investigations and Prosecutions Reflection Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.