Intro to Criminal Justice

January 19, 2023

Intro to Criminal Justice

Order Number	65364577656476465
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Intro to Criminal Justice

Drawing from course content, briefly explain in your own words, the dichotomy of the (1) due-process model and (2) crime-control model of criminal justice. Explain how the process of criminal justice might differ under these two competing models of justice. What implications might this have on the process of criminal justice? Differentiate how the police, courts, and correctional services might look under these dualling models of justice. Provide examples.

Not exceeding two-pages double spaced using 12-point font and 1-inch margins Title pages and reference lists do not count towards or against the two-page limit Submissions are to be made at the designated virtual drobox on D2L Brightspace

Assignment Parameters

Anything contained within the course syllabus or lectures need not be referenced in the reference list at the end of your paper; however, you are expected to provide in-text citations for every detail you cite and carry over from course materials (including readings, PowerPoints, and lectures) or outside course materials References coming from outside the course’s syllabus or lectures should be included in the reference list at the end of your paper (citation style at your discretion) Title page and reference list do not count towards the 2-page To keep things fair for everyone, assignment submissions that significantly exceed 2-pages double space might be penalized (removal of some marks)

Helpful Tips

You are encouraged to draw examples from class and textbook resources You can draw examples from external sources as well Examples should be used to better help exemplify the dichotomy between the (1) crime-control model and (2) due-process model of criminal justice Conclude paper by explaining differences in the “process of criminal justice” using examples The process of criminal justice is in reference to the individual functions of the (1) police (2) courts, and the (3) correctional services An exemplary paper should exemplify the differences between the competing versions of criminal justice whilst explaining differences in the process of criminal justice through the use of examples and real-world events Reference syllabus for late policy

[Order Now]

Intro to Criminal Justice

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.