intermittent fasting

February 3, 2023

intermittent fasting

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

intermittent fasting

Conduct a search using an online database to search for literature on the impact of intermittent fasting on a person with health complications. Some of the key concepts are is it safe? Who is safe for? What are the side effects? Who is practicing this fast (age gender) , does the fast with inflammation or diabetes? What are the results?

Keep searching until you find an article close to all of the key concepts mention. You will then choose from the 2 articles and write an abstract for both of the articles. Please include the APA 7 Reference Citation for the Article at the top of the page The abstract should include the following: Template for writing an abstract: Author/s last names (year) conduced a study about __________. The participants were____and. the setting was________. (New paragraph) The findings were_____________. Discussion (Possible a new paragraph). The authors suggested________. Discussion

You will fill in the blanks with your own words. To copy directly from the article fails to show comprehension and may also be considered plagiarism. To fill in the blanks, you need to pay special attention to:

Sentence 1 – Authors’ last name/s (year) conducted a study about….

Read the Abstract: this will give you an overview of the study’s purpose.
Read the entire article without trying to summarize it. ·

Go back and read the literature review or Background section. Toward the end of the section, the authors should identify gaps in the existing literature and will explain to the reader how their current study will fill the gap. The authors will also stat their hypothesis (purpose) at the end of this section.

Section 2 – The participants were, the setting was.. ·

Read the Methods section of the paper. The authors will describe how the data was collected, who was included in the sample and any instruments that were used.

A reader might want to consider sample size, demographic characteristic, or any interesting protocol.
It is not necessary to report ever fact.

Section 3 – The findings were… ·

Read the findings section of the article

Some statistics may be confusing. Pay attention to key words such as increased, decreased, improved, reduced.
No change may be a significant finding
Next, read the Discussion section. The authors will present the findings in general terms.

Section 4 – The authors suggested…. · Read the Discussion section and look for comments that the authors made about the intervention or program such as Did it work? Or should it be continued?

Look for the author’s critique of why the study did or did not produce results. Did anything unexpected influence the findings?
The author may suggest a future line of research or next steps to improve the body of knowledge.

Additional considerations

A literature review is a summary of what research has been completed in a topic area; it should be summarized in your own words.
Read the entire article first and then go back and take notes. Jot down notes in your own words. This increases comprehension and decreases the likelihood of plagiarism.
The review is written in 3rd person – no I or you
Unless otherwise stated, the review ideally reflects articles published in the last 5-10 years ·

– Not every detail or fact needs to be reported. · Write the literature in the past tense; the research has already been completed. ·

The article cannot do, find or say anything. The authors are the people who conducted the study.

[Order Now]

intermittent fasting

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.