Intelligence and Boulder Cognition Discussion

November 25, 2022

Intelligence and Boulder Cognition Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Intelligence, and, Boulder, Cognition, Discussion

[Order Now]

Discussion topic for Chapter 8: Cognition and Intelligence

Choose one of these options and fully explain your answer in your post. Your post should be at least a long paragraph (4-5 sentences). In your post, you must apply a concept from the textbook. Put the concept in bold print.

Option 1: Why do you think IQ tests such as the Stanford-Binet scale are highly validity in Western cultures, but irrelevant in others? When testing a student from another culture for college admission, should a standard intelligence test be used? Why or why not?

Option 2: Gardner’s theory that there are eight types of intelligence is very popular. Do you agree all eight of his types of intelligences are really types of intelligence, or are they skills? What leads you to believe that? Give an example of one of Gardner’s types of intelligence (not logical-mathematical or linguistic), and how you might test it.

Option 3: How do you think culture shapes creativity? Do you think different cultures or settings have similar conceptions of creativity?

Option 4: According to the Flynn Effect, Western nations have shown average IQ gains of 15 points during the last 30 years. Do you think IQ scores will continue to improve? What factors could contribute to continued enhanced IQ scores?

After you have submitted your post, you must respond substantively to someone else’s post. An example of substantive would be addressing another issue from the book or lecture that applies to that person’s post, or talking about something that you have read somewhere else or learned in another class that is relevant to that person’s post. Cite the source of your information it is a source outside of the textbook.

The textbook name is Psychology Themes and Variations 11th edition Wayne Weiten.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Intelligence and Boulder Cognition Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.