Integration of Individuals and Systems to Organizational Effectiveness

November 24, 2022

Integration of Individuals and Systems to Organizational Effectiveness

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Integration of Individuals and Systems to Organizational Effectiveness

[Order Now]

The topics of management and leadership are important to a healthy and productive organization. Students will write a paper focused on the human side of management and leadership using information from the course material, plus any supplemental material provided to you or from your own research.

This paper requires student to reflect on the various topics covered in chapters 6-8 and then select three aspects of the human side of management and leadership and write about what is valuable to you, not to employees or other stakeholders within an organization. In writing this short paper, students are expected to explain why each aspect is valued and why. In explaining why, students must support their reasoning using the course material.

Students need to avoid taking articles and writing the paper around the article. Course material and articles contain information that will help students support their reasoning and it the reflection of the material that will provide the basis for the paper.

By completing this assignment, students will meet the outcome(s):

identify the critical business functions and how they interact in order to position the organization to be effective in the current business environment

explain the importance of the integration of individuals and systems to organizational effectiveness

describe the ethical and social responsibilities that confront a business

Required Elements of the Short Paper:

Identify three aspects of the human side of management and leadership that you value from the readings;

Explain why you value these aspects;

Apply the material learned in the course to support the reasoning of why you value these aspects.

Required Formatting of Paper:

This report should be double spaced, 12-point font, and two to three pages in length excluding the title page and reference page;

Title page;

Introductory paragraph and a summary paragraph

Use APA formatting for in-text citations and a reference page. You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes. Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary;

Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder.

I can provide the chapters of reading for this as well.

501 8-9

3 pages

Topic: clinical interviewing

Assignment: Clinical interviewing is an essential skill that takes a great deal of practice. Compare and contrast the different types of clinical interviews and identify the settings or circumstances in which you would use each.

501 12-14

7 pages

Topic: Theoretical orientations: psychodynamic, humanistic, and cognitive-behavioral

Assignment: As a clinical psychology doctoral student, you will be required to choose a primary theoretical orientation. This does not mean that you have to choose just one and only student and gain competency in one, but you must be able to identify your primary theoretical orientation. It is essential that you understand these. Write a narrative describing each, make comparisons and contrasts, and talk about what orientation you most identify with at this point.

503 8-9

3 pages

Reading Assignments: Machi & McEvoy chapter 6, journal articles set “C”

Written Assignments: Assignment 6: Produce an extremely detailed outline composed the key points to be made in each paragraph (with an adjacent citation that includes the page numbers on which the points are based) of a brief scholarly argument paper based on the articles in set “C.”

503 10-12

6 pages

Reading Assignments: Machi & McEvoy chapter 6.

Written Assignments: Assignment 7: Produce an extremely detailed outline including the key points for each paragraph (with an adjacent citation that includes the page numbers on which the points are based) for a brief scholarly argument paper based on the articles in sets “A” and “B.” Assignment 8 is to produce an integrated outline based on the articles in sets “A,” “B,” and “C.” This assignment also requires that you write a one-page abstract describing the paper which you intend to write during unit 8, based on this outline.

[Order Now]

503 13-14

16 pages

Reading Assignments: Use APA Publication Manual as your reference guide for the written assignment.

Written Assignments: Compose a scholarly argument paper based solely upon the articles contained in sets “A-C.” The purpose of this exercise is to demonstrate everything you learned in this class. The integration of seemingly unrelated topics is part of the challenge. Adherence to APA style is of critical importance.

Integration of Individuals and Systems to Organizational Effectiveness

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.