Industrial Hygiene and Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act

November 26, 2022

Industrial Hygiene and Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Industrial, Hygiene, Superfund, Amendments, Reauthorization, Act

[Order Now]

QUESTION 1

Explain ways an industrial hygienist might get called on to help a company manage compliance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements like the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), and air permitting.

Your response must be at least 75 words in length.

QUESTION 2

Describe the control methods you believe would be the most effective for reducing the risk from exposure to high noise levels associated with multiple hydraulic presses in an automobile manufacturing facility.

Your response must be at least 75 words in length.

QUESTION 3

Summarize how an industrial hygienist can use toxicology data to perform a risk assessment for an occupational chemical exposure.

Your response must be at least 75 words in length.

QUESTION 4

Discuss your approach to evaluating an occupational exposure to welding fumes, including the sampling method you would use, whether you would use a personal or area sample, and how you would evaluate the analytical results to evaluate the risks associated with the exposure.

Your response must be at least 75 words in length.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Industrial Hygiene and Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.