Importance of Selective Precipitation Assignment

December 5, 2022

Importance of Selective Precipitation Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Importance of Selective Precipitation Assignment

[Order Now]

I need you to answer these 11 questions depending on the experiment attached:

What questions will be answered with the results obtained from this experiment?

What kinds of selective precipitation will be used to detect the presence of metal cations? What kind of selective precipitation will be used to detect the presence of anions?

What is the main question this experiments seeks to answer?

What is the best way to insure that there are no false positives or that there is not contamination or interference from unwanted ions in the solution?

How is selective precipitation used to identify unknown ions in this experiment?

What technique is used to separate precipitate from the ions that remain dissolved in the solution? What techniques are used to treat the precipitates for additional analyses?

Discuss the importance of selective precipitation.

What results will be collected and recorded in your lab notebook?

[Order Now]

What can be expected if the ions are correctly identified? What are some things that might prevent the ions from being correctly identified?

What is this experiment designed to measure? What will the results NOT tell us about the experiment?

What special safety precautions do you need to be aware of for this experiment?

Importance of Selective Precipitation Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.