Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Rural Hospital

December 1, 2022

Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Rural Hospital

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Rural Hospital

[Order Now]

Case Assignment

Read the following article: Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program in a rural hospital. This is an article that describes a program that was implemented at a rural hospital. After reading the article and doing other reserach, please respond to the following questions.

Briefly discuss the program and what led to its implementation.

In general, what are the different types of program evaluation available to a manager?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of each one?

What program evaluation was used in this case?

Based upon the data and other information in the article, was this the best approach?

What did the evaluation reveal about the program? Did it achieve what it was supposed to? Should it be continued or even replicated elswhere?

I HAVE ATTACHED THE ARTICLE

[Order Now]

Be sure to conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to familiarize yourself with the facts of the case and be sure to justify/support your position.

Limit your responses to a maximum of three pages.

Please support your discussions with scholarly support (3-5 references). Be sure to properly cite all references.

Apply critical thinking skills the the assignment component.

Case Assignment

Briefly discuss the program and what led to its implementation.

In general, what are the different types of program evaluation available to a manager?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of each one?

What program evaluation was used in this case?

Based upon the data and other information in the article, was this the best approach?

What did the evaluation reveal about the program? Did it achieve what it was supposed to? Should it be continued or even replicated elswhere?

I HAVE ATTACHED THE ARTICLE

[Order Now]

Be sure to conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to familiarize yourself with the facts of the case and be sure to justify/support your position.

Limit your responses to a maximum of three pages.

Please support your discussions with scholarly support (3-5 references). Be sure to properly cite all references.

Apply critical thinking skills the the assignment component.

Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Rural Hospital

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.