Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
I want you to write a reply paragraph for an essay, telling your opinion and thoughts about the essay.
I will post a reply example and the essay I want you to reply to. I want the reply to be the same length as the example.
This is the reply example:
I like your topic, it is really informative and interesting. Solar power is really a hot topic recently. Since the energy crisis will appear in our future, we have to figure it out a sustainable and environmental-friendly energy. I only have a few questions about your research paper. First, will you mention how solar power benefit the economy of Arizona? Then, solar power is not a new invention, but why it is still not popular in Arizona? Is that because it is not economically? Or inefficiently? Finally, I believed everything has twos sides, so what is the bad side of solar power in Arizona? I hope my questions will not bother you, I am looking forward to see your research paper.
And this is the essay I want you to reply to.
This time I am going to share my library orientation experience with you. I think the library orientation was really good and helpful to our future. First, Sara, the librarian, really did a great job explaining how to use the resources in library. She clearly explained all the things step by step. In addition, we will have more and more work requiring us to do research, therefore knowing how to use the library resources is beneficial to us. The library is a free resource which we can use at almost any time. It is wasted if we do not get anything from it. Overall, this library orientation is helpful in our academic work, I am grateful that I had the chance to be there.
When I was doing the practice, I still faced some obstacles. My problems were mainly on the part that we have to find the information. I figured out that my problem was being unfamiliar with the system, yet. I believed there are some people who may have the same problem as I do. Practice makes perfect. Thus, I kept practicing, research on different things. Finally, after several times practicing, I overcame all problems by myself.
If others are going to do this same assignment, I will give them three suggestions which will make it easier. First, you really have to focus on the librarian’s lecture. Once you missed something, it is really hard to catch up later. Secondly, try to follow what the librarian just demonstrated on the screen. During the first time you do it, there will be some problems, so you can ask the librarian immediately. Lastly, I recommend you do it with your partner. It is more fun, and most importantly you can share what you have learned which can enhance both your knowledge and allow you to become more and more familiar with using the library resources.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/