BU 38880 IMCs Board of Directors Discussion

BU 38880 IMCs Board of Directors Discussion

Instructions/Descriptions

BU 38880 IMCs Board of Directors Discussion

IMC’s Board of Directors

You have been elected to Investment Management Corporation’s (IMC) board of directors. The board consists of five members. Recently, by a vote of four in favor and one opposed (you were the one opposed), the board voted to give annual college scholarships in the amount of $100,000 to local students. Last year, IMC made a profit of $2 million dollars, but the board did not vote to give shareholders dividends. You are concerned that some of the other board members have violated the business judgment rule in making their decision, based on the following additional facts about the four board members who voted in favor of the annual scholarships:

Peter, who works as a guidance counselor, is newly elected to the board and has only been on the board for one month. Peter has made a cursory review of corporate records. Peter is very good friends with the CEO, who recommended in favor of the vote. Peter also has two children, ages 16 and 17.

Paul, an advertising executive, is a very busy man and attends about four meetings a year. The board meets every month. Paul has been on the board for 10 years and stays in touch with the CEO whenever he is out of town.[Order Now]

Mary, a CPA, has been a board member for three years. Mary just returned from a trip to Europe. After two hours of sleep, Mary reviewed all corporate records before voting.

Janice, a retired high school teacher, serves on many corporate boards of directors. Some of the corporations are competitors of IMC.

Instructions:

For your initial response, prepare an argument against one or more of the board members, suggesting that the member(s) has (have) violated the business judgment rule.

Be sure to discuss the member’s fiduciary duties and explain which duty or duties the member(s) may have violated and explain why

Include any assumptions you have made.

Post replies to at least two other students.

You can politely agree or disagree.

You must include new information in your replies to further the discussion.

Doing more than the minimum will enhance your grade.

All posts are to be substantial, incorporate course concepts, and relate to the discussion issue.

You might also want to conduct some independent research to enhance your posts.

Submission Details:

Post your initial response (250-300 words)

(The discussion Assignment is due tomorrow at 11:59pm ET so start on this first)

[Order Now]

Peer Responses

(Respond to each of the two students. Use 150-200 words when responding to students, Start off with (“hello Name”).

*(The students haven’t posted their Discussion posts yet but when they do, I will give them to you so you can respond to them)

Lexis Nexis Assignment

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

The purpose of this problem assignment is for you to become familiar with how to use the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) website to investigate information on various publicly traded corporations and to use the LexisNexis database to explore statutory law pertaining to corporations in the state you selected in the Week 2 LexisNexis Assignment. The SEC website is also useful for exploring companies you may want to invest in. You will be preparing a brief report consisting of two sections.

*The Instructions and the assignment matrix are attached below

*(This Assignment is important so if you can’t guarantee quality work then don’t bid. if instructions are not followed then the assignment will be refunded.)BU 38880 IMCs Board of Directors Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!