Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Overview: In Final Project Part Two, you will develop a multimedia presentation in which you will have a chance to reflect on what you have learned about your issue or event, yourself, and diversity through analyzing its impact on society. You will also be able to apply your communication skills and integrate multimedia elements to communicate your message to an audience. This milestone is due in Module Five.
In developing this presentation, you will be able to use your analyses from the first part of this project as a starting point. The reflective nature of this activity prompts you to dig deeper and consider the implications posed by the critical analysis of your issue or event in diversity. How does studying diversity affect how you understand yourself, as well as the world around you? You’ll also be challenged to incorporate a dash of creativity to enhance your message.
Multimedia Presentation: For the second part of the project, you will create a multimedia presentation that incorporates audio narration and visuals to articulate how critically analyzing your issue/event in diversity impacts your own framework of perception and ability to constructively engage in society.
PowerPoint: You are required to include a combination of text and visuals in order to support your PowerPoint presentation. Use the Check File Compatibility with Earlier Versions and Are You Having Video or Audio Playback Issues? resources to help you check compatibility between versions of Office.
Also, follow the instructions on the Microsoft Support page to compress your presentation as a zipped file. You may upload a zipped file when submitting this assignment. Reducing the size of the PowerPoint presentation file by compressing it makes it easier for your instructor to download and grade.
Microphone: While it is not necessary to purchase a microphone for this project, you will need to have access to a microphone to record the narration of the presentation. This could be the external microphone of your device, a set of earbuds, or equipment borrowed from a friend. This assignment is graded on the content of the narration, not the quality of the recording.
Prompt: First, review the module resources you have encountered so far and create a presentation draft (PowerPoint with speaker notes) that analyzes the issue/event under study (the one you selected in Module Two).
Specifically, the following critical elements (which align to the critical elements required of the presentation in Final Project Part Two) must be addressed:
https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Zip-a-file-054f6f8a-eda5-4974-8ac2-59deb78001c1
you perceive the world.
III. Society: This section of your presentation explores how studying diversity enhances your ability to engage constructively in society. A. How does critically analyzing diversity add value to how you interact with people and understand social or global issues/events? Supplement your reasoning with examples.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Milestone Three should be approximately 10 to 12 slides. You are required to include a combination of text and visuals in order to support your work. Support your presentation with relevant resources cited in APA format and noted on a separate slide. If you require alternative accommodations for completing this assignment, reach out to your instructor directly for more information.
Note: Turnitin, the originality report feature used in the course, is not able to check PowerPoint submissions for plagiarism. Thus, you should submit your speaker notes in a separate Word document. Both files (PowerPoint and Word) can be submitted through the Milestone Three submission item.
Please note that the grading rubric for this milestone submission is not identical to that of the final project. The Final Project Part Two Rubric will include an additional “Exemplary” category that provides guidance as to how you can go above and beyond “Proficient” in your final submission.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Issue/Event: Social or Global Issue/Event
Describes a social or global issue/event and how it relates to problems in diversity, using appropriate research strategies
Describes a social or global issue/event and how it relates to problems in diversity, but description is cursory or research strategies are inappropriate
Does not describe a social or global issue/event and how it relates to problems in diversity
9
Issue/Event: Impact on Society
Describes impact of the issue/event on society using appropriate research strategies
Describes the impact of the issue/event on society, but the description is cursory or research strategies are inappropriate
Does not describe the impact of the issue/event on society
9
Issue/Event: Society Impacts
Assesses how society impacts the chosen issue, using relevant research or diverse perspectives
Assesses how society impacts the chosen issue, but explanation is cursory or utilization of relevant research or diverse perspectives is inappropriate
Does not assess how society impacts the chosen issue
9
Yourself: Individual Framework of Perception
Explains how critically analyzing an issue/event in diversity has informed individual framework of perception
Explains how critically analyzing an issue/event in diversity has informed individual framework of perception, but explanation is cursory
Does not explain how critically analyzing an issue/event in diversity has informed individual framework of perception
6
Yourself: Individual Field of Study or Profession
Explains how critically analyzing diversity can influence discipline of study or profession
Explains how critically analyzing diversity can influence discipline of study or profession, but explanation is cursory
Does not explain how critically analyzing diversity can influence discipline of study or profession
9
Society: Interact Explains how critically analyzing diversity adds value to interactions with people and to understanding social or global issues/events
Explains how critically analyzing diversity adds value to interactions with people and to understanding social or global issues/events, but explanation is cursory
Does not explain how critically analyzing diversity adds value to interactions with people and to understanding social or global issues/events
9
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Society: Strategies Recommends strategies for using critical analysis for meeting personal and professional goals
Recommends strategies for using critical analysis for meeting personal and professional goals, but recommendations are inappropriate
Does not recommend strategies for using critical analysis for meeting personal and professional goals
9
Conclusion: Benefits and Challenges
Assesses the benefits and challenges of addressing issues in diversity, using relevant research or diverse perspectives
Assesses the benefits and challenges of addressing issues in diversity, but analysis is cursory or utilization of relevant research or diverse perspectives is inappropriate
Does not assess the benefits and challenges of addressing issues in diversity
8
Conclusion: Adds Value Explains how critically analyzing diversity adds value to interactions with people in personal and professional contexts
Explains how critically analyzing diversity adds value to interactions with people in personal and professional contexts, but explanation is cursory
Does not explain how critically analyzing diversity adds value to interactions with people in personal and professional contexts
8
Presentation: Organized Constructs the presentation in such a way that it ensures the audio and visual elements are logically organized
Presentation is constructed with audio and visual elements, but the organization is somewhat illogical
Does not construct the presentation in a way that ensures audio and visual elements are logically organized
6
Presentation: Evidence Provides supporting evidence in the presentation that supports the importance of the chosen issue/event and its impact within diversity
Provides supporting evidence, but evidence does not sufficiently support the importance of the chosen issue/event and its impact within diversity
Does not provide evidence that supports the importance of the chosen issue/event and its impact within diversity
8
Presentation: Flow Develops the audio narration to logically flow with the presentation to articulate the importance of critically analyzing the chosen issue/event and its impact within diversity
Develops the audio narration, but it does not logically flow with the presentation to articulate the importance of critically analyzing the chosen issue/event and its impact within diversity
Does not include audio narration to articulate the importance of the chosen issue/event and its impact within diversity
6
Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
4
Total 100%
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/