Identifying Criminal Case Processes

February 16, 2023

Identifying Criminal Case Processes

Order Number	7545244253676345
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Identifying Criminal Case Processes

As a court clerk, understanding criminal case processes and procedures will enable you

to support the judge, lawyers, plaintiffs, and defendants in a courtroom. Some tasks may include precise record-keeping, writing, and reviewing court documents for various

stages of a criminal case. A clear understanding of criminal case processes will be

crucial. Research and review a criminal case that uses one of the common defense

justifications you learned in your chapter readings this week.

Provide a link to a summary or news report of the case. Give a brief overview of the

case. Include the defense’s argument and the case ruling. Consider the following questions as you conduct your research: • What evidence did the defense attorney provide in an effort to prove the argument? • What evidence did the prosecutor provide in an effort to dispute or disprove the defense’s argument? • Do you agree with the case ruling? Why or why

not?

Link below to book, chapter readings Chapter 1-4

https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781260813777/epub/OEBPS/11_Chapter01.html#page_2

[Order Now]

Identifying Criminal Case Processes

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.