Hurricane Katrina

February 7, 2023

Hurricane Katrina

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Hurricane Katrina

For this assignment

Provide a synthesized review of the scholarly literature and address your study’s theoretical foundations or practice orientation.

Your supporting evidence should include:

Primary orientation.

Efforts to address the problem.

Synthesis of evidence.

Your project questions should illuminate the gap in the literature and align with the topic, problem, and evidence.

Explain the proposed gap supported by scholarly literature or the practical implications of the proposed study.

Synthesize a review of the scholarly literature to expose, explain, and analyze previous scholarly efforts to address the project or problem.

Project Questions: List one or more project questions that align with the topic, problem, and supporting evidence within the program. Include a list of terms and definitions that relate to the program, topic, problem, gap, program, and

project framework.

Describe your target population. Describe the background for your study and how your question relates to the background of the study. Discuss previous studies and demonstrate precisely how your project (answering the question, applying to practice) will advance the scientific knowledge base on this topic.

Consider the following guidance: Questions should be appropriate for the knowledge gap and current state of knowledge

(supporting evidence). Questions are cast using the variables or phenomena under study. The variables or phenomena in the questions are identical to the variables discussed in the problem and specific theory gap. Questions are explicit in naming the type of relationship or phenomenon under study. When answered, questions will make a contribution to theoretical or practical foundations. The contribution to the academic field and to the theoretical foundation must speak to how the relationship among the variables or to the phenomenon addresses the knowledge gap previously identified.

[Order Now]

Hurricane Katrina

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.