How To Step Back From Being A Leader

How To Step Back From Being A Leader

Instructions/Descriptions

How To Step Back From Being A Leader

[Order Now]

Leadership Change: How to step back from being a leader (manager) and become a leader follower (non-managerial) after the Military and still be successful.

Please provided the following information in the paper.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Introduction (6 Pages)

1. Background of the Problem
2. Purpose of the Study (briefly introducing the study and research questions)
3. Significance (briefly explaining who your study will be of value to and why)

Summary

Chapter 2: Literature Review (6 Pages)

This features a discussion of literature related to the research topic and comes from research carried out by other experts on a previous date. It shows how your research diverts from or is like common interpretations. Please include the following on the article you are reviewing. Book/Journal title, Author(s), Editor(s) (edited books only), Chapter Title, Page(s), URL (for online sources only), and Publisher

Review of Literature

Military Leadership Development

Veterans in the Workplace

Chapter 3: Conceptual Framework (6 Pages)

(Situates your work within a conceptual framework, explains key constructs, introduces, or clarifies any theoretical models involves, and situations your work within prior theory and research on the question; begin with an introductory paragraph introducing the elements of the conceptual framework and conclude with a summation that helps review the need for your study and thus transitions to the methodology)

Chapter 4: Methodology (6 Pages)

In this case, the author dwells into discussing the sources of data and methods of collecting such data for the project. For instance, the primary methods, visual methods, and secondary data can be considered. The temptation is always trying to make this as short as possible when writing a dissertation proposal, yet it is the section that guides on what must practically be done. It also reveals the resources needed, amount of work and time to carry out each specific task to complete the project.

Research Design (with justification and citations of other research using that approach or to theorists of that approach) [usually needed for qualitative, possibly for quantitative]

Qualitative/Quantitative Research Design

Research Sites/Population/Sampling/Subjects/Participants

Procedures [usually needed for quantitative; less often used in qualitative]

Proposed Interview Method

Approach to Data Analysis

Research Perspective: Paradigms and Ethics

Ethics

Assumptions and Limitations

Timeline

Conclusion (2 Pages)

The final step in writing a dissertation proposal is to write a conclusion. The conclusion should briefly summarize the main points of the proposal and emphasize the importance of the research. It should also explain how the research will contribute to the field of study and why it is significant. Finally, the conclusion should encourage readers to support the proposed research. By following these steps, you can ensure that your dissertation proposal is well-written and persuasive.

References

Articles for the Literature Review can only come from the journals below.

Management and Leadership Journals

Academy of Management Learning & Education Academy of Management Learning & Education (aom.org)

Academy of Management Review            https://aom.org/research/journals/review

California Management Review https://journals.sagepub.com/home/cmr

Coaching: Int’l Journal of Theory, Research, & Practice (UK)          CORE – Aggregating the world’s open access research papers

Global Strategy Journal  http://gsj.strategicmanagement.net/

International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration                http://www.nationalforum.com/Journals/International%20Journal%20of%20Management,%20Business,%20and%20Administration/International%20Journal%20of%20Management,%20Business,%20and%20Administration/ijmba.htm

[Order Now]

Journal of Applied Behavioral Science     http://jab.sagepub.com/

Journal of Management Development   http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0262-1711

Management Learning  http://mlq.sagepub.com/

Organization Development Network Publications              http://www.odnetwork.org/?Publications

Sloan Management Review         http://sloanreview.mit.edu/the-magazine/2012-winter/

Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal          http://sej.strategicmanagement.net/

Strategic Management Journal   http://smj.strategicmanagement.net/

Appendix (3 Pages if needed)

Qualifying Survey questions to answer the research question. Place questions that will be answered during the surveys. Along with any scales used.

How To Step Back From Being A Leader

RUBRIC Excellent Quality 95-100%   Introduction 45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Literature Support 91-84  points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Methodology 58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. Average Score 50-85% 40-38 points More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. 83-76  points There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. 52-49  points The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Poor Quality 0-45% 37-1 points The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. 75-1 points There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. 48-1 points There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. How To Step Back From Being A Leader Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

How To Step Back From Being A Leader

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!