How Secondary and Tertiary Education Impacts Individuals Discussion

November 29, 2022

How Secondary and Tertiary Education Impacts Individuals Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

How Secondary and Tertiary Education Impacts Individuals Discussion

[Order Now]

Clarify and provide examples of how secondary and higher education in the U.S. shapes individuals’ incomes, status, work and career opportunities, understanding of the culture, and life satisfaction over the life course. Relate this to the concept of the “hidden curriculum”, as proposed by Durkheim. Besides teaching knowledge and skills across various disciplines, what other major items do secondary schools and colleges and universities teach, explicitly or implicitly?

Your writing should begin with an overview of your opinion and summary of data supporting it and rely on evidence from this week’s readings and any other pertinent course materials (e.g. lecture video) from this week, stated in a clear and organized manner. The writing should be approximately the equivalent of one page double-spaced with citations of our relevant sources to provide evidence for your argument.

Violent Crime Discussion

I’m working on a sociology multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

[Order Now]

The media often profiles individuals who have been charged with or who engaged in violent crimes. Such profiles seek to identify characteristics that can be used to identify individuals with a high probability of engaging in similar activities. The key finding of the United States Secret Service’s research into school violence is that “There is no accurate or useful profile of students who engaged in targeted violence.” Think about this quote and what you have read about the shooters profiled by Langman so far. What were the areas of greatest similarity among shooters? What were the key differences among shooters? Is it really possible for us to develop a profile of potential shooters? If so, what type of ethical concerns would we need to engage with while applying such a profile?

How Secondary and Tertiary Education Impacts Individuals Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.