How organizational, cultural and social differences may influence ethical codes

November 25, 2022

How organizational, cultural and social differences may influence ethical codes

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

How, organizational, cultural, and, social, differences, may, influence, ethical, codes

[Order Now]

Step 1. Search for and select a code of ethics from either (a) a US profession that is related to psychology (eg social work, physical therapy, engineering, banking, legal services, medicine or similar) or (b) search for and select a code of ethics from a psychological organization in another country (Tien et al p 540 has links to some, but I encourage you to explore beyond this list).

Step 2.

(a) Write a comparison of the code you have selected with that of the APA. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.p… this by identifying:

what ethical principles and issues are common to both;
which of the key elements each code has or emphasizes;
elements or principles unique to either code;
and propose possible reasons for the differences in the two codes (600-800 words).

(b) Identify how well each code is influenced by and accommodates the special needs of different organizational pressures or national cultures. (600-800 words)

(c) Identify how well each code (and its associated guidelines, if any) specifically addresses and accommodates the needs and values of a minority or marginalised group of interest to you. (200-400 words)

(d) Identify ethical issues raised by current events that either code has not caught up with. (200-400 words)

(e) Write a brief closing summary stating which code you would prefer to work under and why. (200-400 words).

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

How organizational, cultural and social differences may influence ethical codes

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.