Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
How, Hard, Is, It, to, Say, No, Case, Discussion
How hard is it to say “no”?
“If all your friends jumped off a bridge, would you?” My mother said this literally two minutes after I got home. Because she had just had a call from a deputy sheriff who had busted three of my friends and I for – you got it – jumping off a bridge.
Now, in all fairness, it was late July. We had been baling hay all day. The river was a mile down the road – actually, we had to go over it on our way back to the barn. So, when Brent* suggested it, Donny said “Hell yeah!,” and Ryan was also quick to agree. Me … well, I knew it wasn’t the BEST idea to jump off that bridge. After all, just the week before, one of our classmate, Brenda J. went off the bridge and was still in the hospital with two broken femurs. But, the other three were like “Dude. DUDE. Duuuuuuuuuuuuuude.”
After you’ve been triple-duded, you just can’t not jump. Something Mom didn’t understand.
We jumped. More than once. Oh, did it feel good getting the dust, sweat, and chaff washed off. We jumped, swam, and relished in being in our mid-teens, unbreakable and impervious to everything.
Everything but the long arm of the law and the Wrath of the Mothers. Deputy Steward pulled up on the bridge as Ryan was just getting ready to jump, and of course, Ryan ratted us all out…he didn’t get the snitches get stitches concept, and the deputy made us get going and then went back to the station and called our mom’s.
Looking back on that day, I said numerous times that I didn’t want to jump. I was called a chicken, coward, and much worse by my friend. I grew up with these guys. And finally, to stop the taunts, I went along with the group. A purer case of peer pressure can’t be chronicled.
How hard is it, especially when you’re with a group of people who are you friends, to say ‘no’and stick by it? Because, here’s the thing, when it’s asked as a question in a format like this, people always want to make themselves out to be impervious to things like peer pressure.
So, I want you to tell me about a time where you succumbed to peer pressure and what you could have done to prevent it from happening. And, please, don’t use examples where I’ll be forced to contact the authorities. Heh
Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached
How Hard Is It to Say No Case Discussion
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/