Holdings Corporation Background Marketing Question

November 30, 2022

Holdings Corporation Background Marketing Question

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Holdings Corporation Background Marketing Question

[Order Now]

You will prepare an abstract for your paper, regarding a publicly-traded company that has either failed, or has been struggling to compete in recent years. Examples of such companies include: Blackberry, Toys“R”Us, Kodak, Blockbuster, Barnes & Noble, Pet.com, Macy’s, Sears, The Sharper Image, Saab, Harley Davidson, and many more… Your task is to research and strategize a way for your chosen company to return and be competitive in a global market.

At the beginning of the term, each student is expected to first submit a 1-2 page Abstract, which should include the following: 1) the name of the firm, (2) a short description of the firm’s background, (3) reasons why you chose to prepare a marketing strategy for this firm, and (4) key issues or challenges the firm is currently experiencing, or faced prior to shutting down.

Social Media Has Revolutionized Contemporary MKTG Landscape Discussion

[Order Now]

I’m working on a marketing question and need support to help me learn.

Many marketers believe that social media has significantly revolutionized the contemporary marketing landscape. Do you agree? Discuss your position

Holdings Corporation Background Marketing Question

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.