Order Number |
65363737383 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY/DISERTATION |
Writer Level |
PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED |
Format |
APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD |
Academic Sources |
10 -20 |
Page Count |
4-8 PAGES |
History WW1 Essay
Our first essay offers an opportunity for you to explore a major theme in the history of the First World War either by drawing on some of the primary sources we have read, or by exploring some of the resources accessible via the website of the Imperial War Museum in London. Here are four criteria for an excellent paper: (1) an incisive, illuminating thesis; (2) well-selected examples drawn from primary or archival sources; (3) awareness of the historical contexts in which these sources were created; and (4) clear, engaging, error-free writing.
(Choose 1 of next 5 prompts to write on)
The purpose of this prompt is to allow you to work with and create a very specific kind of history, which operates on the level of the individual and focuses on personal experiences as a way of viewing large-scale historical events. In doing so, we’re asking you to craft a history of one person and his or her relationship to the First World War by using the Imperial War Museum’s Lives of the First World War database. It might be helpful to think of this as similar to an encyclopedia entry; you are trying to find as much information as is relevant for an understanding of your individual’s experience of the First World War and to explain some of that information by linking it to the events of the war and trying to pull out some themes that punctuate this person’s experience.
Using the IWM Lives of the First World War database, choose a particular participant in the war and construct his or her profile and experiences of the war by considering the following questions:
Notable Individuals We’ve broken up this list along the categories suggested by the Imperial War Museum to help you narrow down what type of experience you’re interested in exploring. The brief descriptions of each person are there to help you further in your choice but please note that your answers in steps 2 and 3 should go beyond these short blurbs. Lastly, feel free to go beyond this list in your choice if you know of another individual who might be featured in the IWM database but try not to spend too much time in making your choice.
Recruitment and Conscription:
Albert French—Volunteered underage at 16 years old
John Boon—Involved in the Derby Scheme and was called up at the end of 1916
Henry Wallace—Veteran of the Boer War who re-enlisted in Canada in 1914
Edward Forster—Pacifist who volunteered with the Red Cross
James Hudson or William Harrison—Refused to fight and were imprisoned as Conscientious Objectors
Thomas Hooker—Still at school when the war began and was conscripted on his 18th birthday
The British Home Front:
Beatrice Bennett—Member of the Women’s Land Army in West Sussex
Dorothy Brown—Munitions worker who died in an accidental explosion
Emma Watkins—Teacher at a school which was bombed during an air raid over London
William L Robinson—Earned a Victoria Cross for shooting down a Zeppelin airship over Hertfordshire
William Rivers—Treated ‘shell shock’ patients at Craiglockhart Hospital, including famous poet Siegfried Sassoon
Trench Warfare:
William Hackett—A tunneller who dug under the German trenches
Thomas Edmed—Fought in Gallipoli and the Western Front
Dorothy Lawrence—Disguised herself as a man with alias Denis Smith to serve as a soldier in the trenches
Rufus Rigney—An indigenous Australian who fought in Belgium
Alan Lloyd—A forward observing officer in the trenches who calculated enemy positions
Alfred Roy Reiffer—Involved in the first tank action in the Somme in 1916
Injuries and Treatment:
Beryl Butterworth—Member of First Aid Nursing Yeomanry
Charles Frampton—Suffered a shrapnel wound which became infected
Robert Jones—Surgeon who specialized in fractures
Ethel Smyth—Trained as a radiographer in France
Harold Gillies—Developed new techniques in plastic surgery
Geoffrey Keynes—Developed mobile blood transfusion units
Beyond the Western Front:
Flora Sandes-Yudenitch—The only British woman who officially served as a soldier, with the Serbian army
John Simpson Kirkpatrick—Australian medic who served in the Gallipoli campaign
Charles Algernon Fryatt—Captain of a merchant ship that encountered German submarines
Ralph Garland Hockaday—Served in Mesopotamia during the war, in what is now Iraq
Florence Farmborough—Served as a nurse in Russia
John Travers Cornwell—Took part in a naval battle at age 16 and received Victoria Cross
Charles Ernest E Bellamy—Barbadian who was awarded Distinguished Conduct Medal
Remembrance and Legacies:
John McCrae—Canadian medic who wrote the famous poem ‘In Flanders Fields’
Edith Cavell—Nurse whose death caused international outrage
William Towers—Wounded in the war and provided with an artificial leg
Evelyn Mackintosh—Member of the Women’s Royal Naval Service and died in 1918 influenza pandemic
Bertrand Trees—Born in the West Indies and killed in 1918 while serving at sea
Charlotte Meade—Died of TNT poisoning from working in a munitions factory
A note on format: The essay should be submitted with a length of five pages, double-spaced lines, one-inch margins, and size 12, Times New Roman font. A note on citation of sources: In all of your assignments, you may use words or ideas drawn from secondary sources in publications, web sites, or other media, but only with proper attribution. “Proper attribution” means that you have fully identified the original source and the extent of your use of the words or ideas of others that you reproduce in your work for this course, usually in the form of a footnote or parenthesis. As a general rule, if you are citing from a published source or from a web site and the quotation is short (up to a sentence or two), place it in quotation marks; if you employ a longer passage from a publication or web site, please indent it and use single spacing. In both cases, be sure to cite the original source in a footnote or in parentheses. Students are expected to familiarize themselves with and follow citation practices as described in either the MLA or Chicago Style Guides.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/