History of Iran and more

February 7, 2023

History of Iran and more

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

History of Iran and more

All papers must be in Chicago-Turabian style format and use footnotes for their citations. You are NOT ALLOWED to use end notes or in-sentence citation formats. Chicago-Turabian is the style format used by the History discipline, much like MLA is the format for the English discipline.

Your paper should be a minimum of 5 pages and up to 10 pages, typed, double-spaced, 1 inch margins, Times New Roman 12 point font.

You must use a minimum of 5 credible academic or professional sources. You shall use JSTOR and any other credible outside sources. Credible sources are academic sources, peer-reviewed sources, major professional publication sources. If you have any doubt whether a source is credible, contact me before using it.

JSTOR RESOURCES — YOU MUST USE A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) ACADEMIC SOURCES FROM JSTOR OR OTHER ACADEMIC OR PROFESSIONAL SOURCE IN YOUR PAPER. You will LOSE 5 points on your paper for each source missing of the 5 required, up to -25 points. JSTOR LINK

The following will not count as one of your 5 sources:

YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO USE BOOK REVIEWS.

YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO USE RANDOM WEBSITES.

YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO USE RANDOM COMMERCIAL SITES.

YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO USE ENCYCLOPEDIAS.

YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO USE WIKIPEDIA.

You DO NEED a title page, however, the title page will not count toward your 5 page minimum. (10 point)
You MUST have a Works Cited page, however, the Works Cited page will not count toward your 5 page minimum. (10 points)
You must use Chicago/Turabian format for your paper. (10 points)
You shall use proper English, correct sentence structure, and proper noun/verb agreement. (10 points)
You shall submit 5 pages minimum written report, not counting the title page or the works cited page. (10 points)

You must fully answer ALL of the following items. Pay attention to their point value. You should have on average, a full paragraph or two for each 5 point question, and a half page to a full page for each 10 point question.

Answer each question in order, and put a paragraph heading over each question that you answer.

The history of Iran – Compare the rulers of the Safavid Empire with the current Islamic Republic of Iran. What do they have in common? How are they different? (You MUST cite examples and quote your documents for each part of this answer.). (10 points)

What were the limitations of the Safavid Empire. What are the limitations of the current Islamic Republic of Iran? (Cite examples, quote documents to support your answer). (10 points)

Look at the rule of the Shah of Iran. What role did the West play in the Shah’s government? Why did the West like the Shah? Why did some Iranians not like the Shah? (Cite examples, quote documents) (10 points)

Look at the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Why did that happen? Does that event still color relations between the US and Iran? Why or why not? (Cite examples, quote documents) (10 points)

Who was Mahsi Amini? Why are people currently protesting in Iran? Who are the majority of people protesting? Why do you think that is? Why should we in the US care about what is happening in Iran right now? (10 points) (Cite examples, quote documents)

All papers must have a Works Cited page at the end of the paper. The Works Cited page lists all your sources, in alphabetical order, once, with the author’s last name first, and first name last.

Please feel free to e-mail me if you have any questions about your paper. Don’t wait until the last minute to ask me questions. Good luck! P.S. DON’T PLAGIARIZE, i.e. COPY SOMEONE ELSE’S WORK WITHOUT CITING THE SOURCE. IF YOU CAN FIND IT ON-LINE, SO CAN I.

[Order Now]

History of Iran and more

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.