Hiring the Right Person to Lead HIM Products and Workflow

January 30, 2023

Hiring the Right Person to Lead HIM Products and Workflow

Order Number	6765436457865335
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Hiring the Right Person to Lead HIM Products and Workflow

For this discussion, imagine that you have been tasked with being the hiring manager for a HIM professional to help lead and improve the workflow and quality of the HIT within the organization. Your first task is to examine the current state of the workflow related to HIT within the organization, or a specific unit or team. Your second task is to curate a brief description or list of characteristics and qualifications that a new HIM professional would have, and to comment on the relevance and importance of them with regards to the position and organization. In your main post: Describe briefly an organization that will be the basis of your post. This could be your current place of practice, a former place of practice, or any health care organization you are interested in and can research effectively. Summarize the current state of the HIT workflow for the organization, unit, or team. Identify the challenges that individuals or role groups are facing within the current workflow. How could trainings or additional supports help to improve their work experience and efficacy? What leadership strategies or best practices could be leveraged to overcome these challenges and improve outcomes related to HIT? Describe briefly the type of person who would be a good fit for the HIM professional position, based on the workflow, challenges facing those working with HIT, and the potential leadership needs. Identify required and desirable qualifications (educations, certifications, and experience) for the position. Which of these qualifications are most relevant and desirable? Why? Comment briefly on how the personal and professional qualifications you identified compare to those in similar job postings. Please use actual job postings either from the Internet or elsewhere as the basis of your comparison. Remember to cite the job postings used for comparison. Support your post with at least one peer-reviewed source, using course readings or other scholarly literature. Include APA-formatted in-text citations and accompanying, congruent APA-formatted references.

[Order Now]

Hiring the Right Person to Lead HIM Products and Workflow

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.