Hero’s Journey

February 3, 2023

Hero’s Journey

Order Number	62333333485643485
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Hero’s Journey

The purpose of this assignment is to gauge students’ comprehensive knowledge of the content presented this semester, based on the example of the Hero’s Journey. The visual below and the video provided at the beginning of the semester can help you focus on steps/stages of the journey you identify with! Keep in mind that there are numerous youtube videos and google images that can help you understand and identify specific steps/stages as well! heros-journey-graph-4web.png Directions: In an MLA Standard document of approximately 4 pages, please create an argumentative essay that describes your Hero’s Journey in this class. Introduction: a) Define and discuss the Hero’s Journey in detail, using your own words. b)Create a thesis with 3 specific steps/stages/parts that best articulate your journey in this class. Body Arguments- For each specific step you identified, please do the following: a)Identify the specific step/stage of the Hero’s Journey you will discuss(1 of 3). b) Provide specific examples of this stage based on your learning experiences in the class c) Discuss in detail what you specifically learned and how it clearly articulates the Hero’s Journey in your own personal, educational journey. Conclusion: Because this is merely one class in your educational journey, discuss how the universal narrative of the Hero’s Journey: Fits in with another class you are taking Fits in with your long-term educational goals Fits in with your personal life and life-long goals

[Order Now]

Hero’s Journey

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.