Healthcare Proposals of Democratic American Presidents From FDR to Obama

January 16, 2023

Healthcare Proposals of Democratic American Presidents From FDR to Obama

Order Number	65236594126454
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Healthcare Proposals of Democratic American Presidents: From FDR to Obama

An analysis of healthcare policy of American Democratic presidents, from FDR to Biden.

This is an analysis and not a criticism or critique of healthcare policy oof Democratic presidents. FDR, TRUMAN, and KENNEDY all proposed universal coverage for all American citizens. Lyndon Johnson tried to ppush for it, but only got partial universal coverage for all American senior citizens via Medicare. Medicare is federal health insurance for anyone age 65 and older, and some people under 65 with certain disabilities or conditions. Medicaid is a joint federal and state program that gives health coverage to some people with limited income and resources.

Seemingly in a step back, Carter proposed more limited health insurance reform—an employer mandate to provide catastrophic private health insurance plus coverage without cost sharing for pregnant women and infants, federalization of Medicaid with extension to the very poor without dependent minor children, and enhancement of Medicare by adding catastrophic coverage.

Bill Clinton – According to an address to Congress by then-President Bill Clinton on September 22, 1993, the proposed bill would provide a “health care security card” to every citizen that would irrevocably entitle them to medical treatment and preventative services, including for pre-existing conditions.

After the failure of Bill Clinton’s plan, the party overall seems to have a adopted a more conservative approach. Obama, started off advocating a universal/single payer system, but managed to get his Afforable Care Act Passed, which essentually made private health insurance more aafforable for more people, while also using government funds/subsidies to pay for low income Americans.

Feel free to use the following to start

https://millercenter.org/health-care-policy/presidents-health-care

https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/abs/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0420

[Order Now]

Healthcare Proposals of Democratic American Presidents From FDR to Obama

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.