Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Healthcare, Information, System, Term, Paper
As the chief information officer (CIO) of St. Augustine’s Hospital, you and your team have successfully had an operational electronic health record (EHR) system. However, there are some concerns about governance, compliance, data quality, and integrity.
Address these concerns by responding to the following:
What are the concerns of leadership in aligning health care information technology (IT) and organizational strategy through the strategic information systems planning (SISP) process?
Explain the various uses of health care data.
Describe the issues or problems associated with the use of health care data.
Describe how you correct or protect against health care data problems.
Identify the components of AHIMA’s health care data quality model.
Demonstrate how these components are used to improve data quality.
Running head: SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (<50 CHARACTERS)
Title
Author
Course and Course #
AIU
Introduction
Scenario
As the chief information officer (CIO) of St. Augustine’s Augustine’s hospitalHospital, you, and as well as your team, have successfully had an operational electronic health record (EHR) system. However, there are some concerns about governance, compliance, data quality, and integrity.
Prepare at minimum a 3-page CIO priorities report to on these concerns. Make sure to cite your references using APA format.
Answer the following questions form the headings headings: Comment by Albertine Idioma: Note to ID: Please clarify this part. Could this be edited as follows? Answer the following questions from the headings: Or Answer the following questions to form the headings. Thanks! I left this as is for now.
Discuss Roles the roles of leadership in aligning Healthcare healthcare IT through the strategic information systems planning (SISP) process.
Explain the Uses uses of healthcare data.
Discuss the Problems problems associated with the use of healthcare data.
Discuss Protection protection against healthcare data problems.
Discuss the Components components of the American Health Information Management Association’s (AHIMA’s AHIMA’s) healthcare data quality model.
Discuss components and data quality improvement.
Conclusion
References
Anderson, Charles C., & Johnson, L. (2003). The impressive psychology paper. Chicago: Lucerne Publishing. (For books)
Smith, M. (2001). Writing a successful paper. The Trey Research Monthly, 53, 149-–150. (For articles)
The references section begins on a new page.
Year of publication: Place in parentheses following authors, with a period following the closing parenthesis. If no publication date is identified, use “n.d.” in parentheses following the authors.
Source reference: This includes the title, journal, volume, and pages (for journal articles) or the title and publisher (for books).
Year of Publication: In parenthesis following authors, with a period following the closing parenthesis. If no publication date is identified, use “n.d.” in parenthesis following the authors.
Source Reference: Includes title, journal, volume, pages (for journal article) or title, city of publication, publisher (for book).
Healthcare Information System Term Paper
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/