Order Number |
096778567878 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
HEA 560 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Policies can be developed to provide recommendations for courses of action to be taken, allocate (or re-allocate) resources, develop solutions to counteract or resolve problems, or grant authority to individuals.
Policies can also be created to develop formal collaborations or partnerships between agencies, create new rules or regulations, or guide strategic efforts in new directions. Whatever the purpose, the intended outcomes of policies are often to remediate a problem or take advantage of a new opportunity through a course of action.
In the context of higher education, high-level critical issues associated with students’ preparation for college-level academics, access to educational institutions, and success in terms of retention and degree completion need to be considered in policy development.
As you draft your proposed admission policy, it is important to consider the intended and unintended outcomes of the admission policy. It may be useful to research how other admission policies have been enacted at other institutions to gauge the potential outcomes that may occur at your institution as well.
While it may appear as though administrations at institutions would be excited to see dramatic increases in enrollment figures, consider the short-term and long-term effects of increased headcounts, including impacts on class sizes, the availability of courses for students, whether students have the ability to enter into the academic majors of their choice, and whether there is sufficient capacity in residential housing for students.
Additionally, consider the constellation of services traditional institutions offer to their students—dining services, counseling and academic advising, medical care, and so on. How will those types of services and facilities be impacted by increases in enrollments?
Alterations to admission requirements may lower institutional selectivity and prestige, lower student satisfaction (especially if they cannot register for required courses because the courses are at capacity), or lead to decreases in retention and graduation rates.
All of these factors need to be considered by higher education administrators when developing policies associated with students’ enrollment. At this stage, begin brainstorming some of the unintended consequences of your admission policy for the institution.
In Module Four, you will research admission policies, and select and develop an admission policy. As you do so, consider the intended outcomes of the policy and whether the policy impacts the mission and vision of the institution. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
become less selective in order to increase student enrollment, while maintaining compliance with higher education regulations? b. Devise and explain your proposed admission policy and include a minimum of two peer-reviewed references justifying your selection of the
policy. Defend your selection of this policy above other possibilities. c. This critical element will require a minimum of one-page following APA format.
What are some reasons for implementing this policy? What are the potential impacts to the institution if the policy is not implemented? How might the policy alter the current state of the institution?
III. Mission and Vision a. Articulate evidence of how elements of the mission and vision were considered when recommending the policy. Consider: What is the
relationship between the mission and vision of the institution and the crafting of policy? Why is it necessary to consider the mission and vision when crafting policy?
federal regulations that apply to enrollment, retention, and completion in higher education? Considering the policy, do the regulations seem logical? Why or why not?
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a four- to five-page (plus a cover sheet and reference page) Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format (following the APA Manual 6th Edition). Ensure that the cover sheet and reference page are also in APA format.
Rubric Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Proposed Policy
Describes proposed policy on attainment, retention, and completion
Describes proposed policy but description is cursory or lacks detail
Does not describe proposed policy on attainment, retention, and completion
30
Intended Outcomes
Describes the intended outcomes of the policy on student attainment, retention, and completion
Describes the intended outcomes of the policy on student attainment, retention, and completion but lacks specificity
Does not describe intended outcomes of the policy on student attainment, retention, and completion
25
Mission and Vision
Articulates evidence of how elements of the mission and vision were considered when recommending policy
Articulates evidence of how elements of the mission and vision were considered when recommending policy but details are cursory and overgeneralized
Does not articulate evidence of how elements of the mission and vision were considered when recommending policy
15
State and Federal
Regulations
Describes how variables of state and federal regulations were considered and included in the development of the policy
Describes how variables of state and federal regulations were included in the development of the policy but lacks accuracy
Does not describe how variables of state and federal regulations were included in the development of the policy
10
Articulation of Response
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas