Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing Teaching Plan Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Hartford ,Institute, Geriatric, Nursing ,Teaching, Plan ,Essay

The topic of your teaching plan can be selected from the list provided on the The Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing website, https://consultgeri.org/geriatric-topics. The evidence to support the teaching plan must include two articles one of which should include a peer review research study.

A brief description of your teaching plan should include the following: Identification of topic, why this topic was selected, and who is the education intended for? Write up two learning objectives including audience, location, 2 objectives, and copies of any handouts. The teaching plan must also include 2 online resources about the topic for the learner. This could be a website, online video, etc. References should be cited at the end of the teaching plan according to APA format. This is submitted in narrative format and must be detailed, especially in the actual content taught. The plan is individualized (and must be presented verbally) to the patient(s), family(ies), and/or staff at the student’s clinical site. Each student is required to submit his/her own individualized written teaching care plan to their clinical faculty for grading (regardless of whether or not it was done as a group, pair, etc.). APA format and spell check are required.

Teaching Plan Essay

The topic of your teaching plan can be selected from the list provided on the The Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing website, https://consultgeri.org/geriatric-topics. The evidence to support the teaching plan must include two articles one of which should include a peer review research study.

A brief description of your teaching plan should include the following: Identification of topic, why this topic was selected, and who is the education intended for? Write up two learning objectives including audience, location, 2 objectives, and copies of any handouts. The teaching plan must also include 2 online resources about the topic for the learner. This could be a website, online video, etc. References should be cited at the end of the teaching plan according to APA format. This is submitted in narrative format and must be detailed, especially in the actual content taught. The plan is individualized (and must be presented verbally) to the patient(s), family(ies), and/or staff at the student’s clinical site. Each student is required to submit his/her own individualized written teaching care plan to their clinical faculty for grading (regardless of whether or not it was done as a group, pair, etc.). APA format and spell check are required.

[Order Now]

Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing Teaching Plan Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.