Handling Stress Essay Paper

Handling Stress Essay Paper

Instructions/Descriptions

Handling Stress Essay Paper

[Order Now]

Understanding Your Score on the IPIP Introversion-Extroversion Scale

Extroversion characterizes people who are outgoing, talkative, sociable, and assertive. It includes several facets, including friendliness, gregariousness, assertiveness, activity level, excitement-seeking, and cheerfulness.

The opposite of extroversion is introversion, which refers to the personality characteristics of being quiet, shy, and cautious. Extroverts get their energy from the outer world (people and things around them), whereas introverts get their energy from the internal world, such as personal reflection on concepts and ideas. Introverts are more inclined to direct their interests to ideas than to social events.

This is the short version of the IPIP Introversion-Extroversion Scale, so it estimates overall introversion-extroversion but not specific facets within the personality dimension. Scores range from 0 to 40.

Low scores indicate introversion; high scores indicate extroversion. Introversion-extroversion norms vary from one group to the next; the best norms are likely based on the entire class you are attending or with past students in this course.

Your score falls within the range of In-between extroversion and introversion. The ranges are: High extroversion (35-40), Moderate extroversion (28-34), In-between extroversion and introversion (21-27), Moderate introversion (7-20), and High introversion (0-6).

Total Score: 24 pts.

Problem Solving

Score: 9 pts.

7-11Feedback: People cope in various ways with stress and various challenges in life. While the preferred coping strategy depends to some degree on the source of the stress, people also have a natural preference for some types of coping strategies more than others. Coping strategies also change over different stages of one’s life.

The Stress Coping Preference Scale estimates your current preference to use four sets of coping strategies: problem solving, social support, avoidance and blaming others. These do not represent the full set of ways that people cope with life’s challenges, but they are common tactics.

Moreover, they are identified as helpful or dysfunctional approaches to stress management. Average People with high scores on this subscale tend to deal with stress by actively attempting to remove the stressor by changing the situation. This coping strategy is associated with higher resilience and usually improves your ability to manage stress. Scores on this subscale range from 0 to 16. The average score in similar measures of coping is between 8 and 9.

Social Support

Score: 6 pts.

6-10Feedback: Average People with high scores on this subscale tend to deal with stress by actively seeking emotional support, information or guidance from others. This coping strategy is part of the ‘tend and befriend’ response that some research suggests is more common among women than among men.

Generally, coping through social support has a beneficial effect and is identified as a favorable approach to stress management. Scores on this subscale range from 0 to 16. The average score in similar measures of coping is slightly less than 8.

Avoidance

Score: 9 pts.

5-9Feedback: Average People with high scores on this subscale tend to deal with stress by cognitively and/or behaviorally acting in ways that prevent the person from coming to terms with and resolving the source of stress. While avoidance may be effective when the problem is short-lived and beyond one’s control, research concludes that this coping strategy is usually an ineffective approach to stress management.

In fact, it significantly differentiates people with high and low resilience. Scores on this subscale range from 0 to 16. The average score in similar measures of coping is around 6.

Blaming Others

Score: 8 pts.

6-10Feedback: Average People with high scores on this subscale tend to deal with stress by directing their energy to identify and seek justice against those perceived as the source of the stressor. This form of coping may include exhibiting emotions or engaging in behaviors that get back at the alleged perpetrators.

Blaming others is generally considered a maladaptive response to stress because it redirects energy away from productive approaches to deal with the stressor. Furthermore, this strategy can potentially alienate others, which reduces opportunities for social support. Scores on this subscale range from 0 to 16. The average score in similar measures of coping is around 7.

Growth-Need Strength

Score: 26 pts.

12-29Feedback: Low growth needs This well-known scale estimates the strength of your growth needs. Growth need strength indicates the strength of your growth needs, including self-esteem, personal achievement, self-actualization. Although organizational behavior scholars now doubt that people have a predetermined needs hierarchy, it is well established that we do have growth needs.

Scores on the Growth Need Strength Scale can range from 12 to 60. Higher scores indicate that you have a higher growth need strength (i.e., stronger growth needs). As the graph shows, total score below 30 indicates a relatively low growth need strength, whereas a score above 42 indicates a relatively high growth need strength.

[Order Now]

Rational decision style

Score: 16 pts.

15-20Feedback: The decision-making style inventory estimates the extent to which you prefer rational and intuitive decision making. Both the ‘rational’ and ‘intuitive’ decision styles have a maximum score of 20 points and a minimum score of 4 points. Notice that you can have higher or low levels of BOTH decision-making styles.

For example, you might score very high on both rational and intuitive decision making. This is not contradictory. Some people engage in more intense rational and intuitive thinking. Strong preference for rational decision-making People with high scores on this scale like to make decisions based on facts and logical analysis. They try to avoid or ignore gut instinct when it contradicts objective information.

Intuitive decision style

Score: 14 pts.

10-14Feedback: Moderate preference for intuitive decision-making People with high scores on this scale like to make decisions based on their inner feelings or ‘gut instinct’. They try to avoid rational choices if they are inconsistent with their intuition.

Handling Stress Essay Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!