Grossmont College racism Colorblind documentary Discussion

November 29, 2022

Grossmont College racism Colorblind documentary Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Grossmont College racism Colorblind documentary Discussion

[Order Now]

I’m working on a sociology question and need guidance to help me learn.

In 4 paragraphs, answer the following questions.

Have you ever heard anyone (maybe even you) dismiss the existence of racism by using one of the five fallacies? If so, how did the conversation go? What were they discussing, and how did the conversation end?

Analyze the Tim Wise Colorblind Lecture. What are his three beliefs (on racism) that keep society from progressing? Do you agree? Why or why not? Why do you believe Americans love to memorize only some parts of the past?

Also, do a brief review of the White Like Me documentary. Did it expand you understanding of race and power in the United States? If so, how? If not, what are some points Tim Wise failed to recognize?

WVCTI Social movement Russia Invasion of Ukraine Paper

Podcasting is a genre that tends to produce pieces with a great deal of depth as the hosts delve explore many different aspects of a single interesting subject.

Your task for the short response assignments will instead be a space for you to reflect as deeply as you can about anything related to collective behavior and social movements.

You might reflect on the definition of a “social movement” and bring in things you have observed in your personal life.

You might write a couple of pages about a specific social movement like the Youth Anti Gun Violence movement you are reading about this week.

[Order Now]

There is almost no level of detail that would be inappropriate because remember you are acting as a participant observer.

On the other hand, an unsuccessful short memo would be one where you attempted to cover too many topics with insufficient detail.

Writing a memo should feel more like a free-writing assignment where the goal is to get your thoughts flowing than like a formal essay or research paper.

Grossmont College racism Colorblind documentary Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.