Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Overview
The purpose of this assignment is to encourage you to apply all that you have learned in this course to a significant current issue. As a result, you should be able to draw some conclusions about the current state of our constitutional and religious history in the U.S. in the 21st century. You will get to look at a specific issue in contemporary culture from the vantage point of our constitutional history. You will also have the opportunity to assess where the United States is today in terms of our legal and religious history.
One of the most controversial areas of Supreme Court recent adjudication lies in its decisions related to religion and politics. You will get to explore two important recent cases regarding religion and politics in the specific area of marriage and marriage ceremonies. These two recent significant cases are Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) and Masterpiece Cake Shop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018). Both cases involve highly contentious issues that get at fundamental debates in contemporary America.
Analyze the Obergefell and Masterpiece cases in light of what you have learned regarding America’s religious and constitutional heritage in this course.
You will have 2 major sections to your paper:
Part I – Facts of the Cases
For each case, include the following areas:
Part II – Your Informed Analysis of the Cases Based upon Course Material
Analyze what these decisions say about where the United States is today in terms of its Constitutional and religious liberties history.
Your discussion must include, but is not limited to, the following lenses of analysis:
Instructions
The specific assignment instructions are the following:
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the SafeAssign plagiarism tool.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/