Google Strategic Marketing Plan Essay Questions

December 3, 2022

Google Strategic Marketing Plan Essay Questions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Google Strategic Marketing Plan Essay Questions

[Order Now]

Google, Strategic, Marketing, Plan, Essay, Questions

For this week, compose a proposal for your final marketing plan project. Your proposal should be about one double-spaced page, and include (in bullets):

The product that you want to address from a new target and modified product perspective? (For example: If you picked Charmin as your product, simply say: I’d like to work on Charmin toilet tissue for this project.)

The publicly traded company that makes the product. What stock market is it traded on and what is its stock symbol? (For example: If you picked Charmin as your product, here you would say: The publicly traded company that makes Charmin is Procter & Gamble. It is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PG.) NOTE the requirements for the company you can select as shown in the attached document… The company name must start with the first letter of your last name or the letter that follows that letter in the alphabet.)

Your initial thinking on what new target you would like to promote the product to. Here’s your opportunity to give some preliminary thoughts as to the new target you are proposing for the product and how you’ll get information on that target, as well as your initial thoughts about how you think you might need to modify the product, the packaging, the marketing approach, etc. This is JUST INITIAL THINKING so I can understand what you’re proposing and so I can potentially provide some advice. Bullets are fine.

Do you have any concerns about either understanding the detailed instructions for the final project or how you will be able to accomplish what’s due by the due date?

This assignment is required to move forward with your marketing plan. Your submission will receive feedback designating either “approval to move forward” or “not approved to move forward”. This “proposal” assignment is not calculated in your overall grade.

ONE student per company. If you submit a product that someone else has earlier selected, you will be asked to submit a different company. (“Register” your company on the discussion board above.) just need a Final Marketing Paper Proposal!

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Google Strategic Marketing Plan Essay Questions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.