Genetic Fallacy and Sociology Concepts Worksheet

November 29, 2022

Genetic Fallacy and Sociology Concepts Worksheet

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Genetic Fallacy and Sociology Concepts Worksheet

[Order Now]

Payne SOCI 135 Winter 2022 Midterm #2 Due Thursday March 10th150 pts.

Please use 12pt. Times New Roman font and please double space responses.
Please insert page numbers and a header with your name and our course information (SOCI 135).
Part One: Identifications. 10 pts x 5 IDs = 50 points
For each of the five concepts below, please provide a brief explanation in your own
words describing what the term means.
Please provide an example from our course materials (readings, documentaries/clips,
lectures, slides) that provide an illustration of each concept.
1.) Reification
2.) Genetic Fallacy (week 5)
3.) Reflexivity
4.) Embodied Expertise
5.) Medicalization
Part Two: Short Answer. 50 pts x 2 prompts = 100 points
Please respond to both of the following two prompts.
Please aim for approximately 3-4 paragraphs per prompt.
Please include two specific examples from our course materials that help illustrate
or provide evidence for each response. (Total of four examples for short answer
portion of midterm).
Continued on Next Page…

2
Payne SOCI 135 Winter 2022 Midterm #2 Due Thursday March 10th 150 pts.
1.) One of the central tasks of medical sociology involves persistently posing the questions:
what counts as objective medical knowledge, who is involved in determining said
objective medical knowledge (ideas and practices), and on what basis are medical claims
legitimately made and practiced? Since completing our first midterm, we have explored
the relationship between various understandings of professional expertise and its
relationship to lay (non-formal) expertise, trust, authority, and decision making.
? From your perspective, is there a fundamental tension between the exercise of
medical expertise and democratic deliberation and decision making? If so,
why? If not, why not? In answering this question, please specify your working
definition of expertise.
? Please discuss two distinct course examples that speak to your answer. Any
relevant course material is fair game for use as examples.
Please Note: You are not required to provide a simple ‘yes’ or hard ‘no’ answer – one of
your examples may suggest a ‘yes’ answer while another may suggest ‘no.’ You may
answer with ‘it depends!’ Please just be sure to fully explain the reasoning guiding the
response you provide.
Continued on Next Page…

3
Payne SOCI 135 Winter 2022 Midterm #2 Due Thursday March 10th 150 pts.
2.) Please take some time to reflect upon the characteristics and consequences of the
organization of the medical system(s) in the United States. Consider the significant social
components of health care in the context of the United States.
? What role(s) does money play in relation to health care in the U.S.?
? To what extent is health care in the United States accessible? That is, in what
sense is health care available or not for particular individuals and groups of
individuals? If health care is not accessible in some or many instances, what
factors might explain these inequalities?

[Order Now]
? Given the materials considered across our course readings, lecture slides,
documentaries/clips etc., what, to your estimation, are real or potential strengths
and limitations of the U.S. health care system?
Please Note: The final portion of prompt 2 (strengths and limitations of U.S.
health care system) is asking for a somewhat more subjective assessment – there
are no ‘wrong’ answers.
Please remember to include at least two examples from our course that speak

Genetic Fallacy and Sociology Concepts Worksheet

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.