GB500 Evaluation of Business Perspectives Discussion

GB500 Evaluation of Business Perspectives Discussion

Instructions/Descriptions

GB500 Evaluation of Business Perspectives Discussion

[Order Now]

UNIT 2

Articles, Books, and Websites

• Cadle, J., Paul, D., & Turner, P. (2014). Business analysis techniques: 99 essential tools for success (2nd ed.). BCS Learning & Development Ltd.

Read: “Technique 42: The Thomas–Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument” (In Chapter 3 – Stakeholder Management)

• Little, L. (2005). Leadership communication and the Johari Window. Administrator, 24(3), 4.
• Maddux, R. B., Osgood, D. A., & Wingfield, B. (2009). Team building: Turn personal strengths into group success (5th ed.). Axzo Press.

Read Part 4: Building Bridges to Better Communication

• Riel, J., & Martin, R. (2014, Winter). Integrative thinking 2.0: A user’s guide to your opposable mind. Rotman Management, 4-9.

Videos

• Davenport, T. (2012). Participative problem solving [Video]. Skillsoft.
• Curtis, L. (2012). The power of team problem solving [Video]. Skillsoft.
• Knowledge Access. (2016, October 20). The five stages of team development [Video]. Skillsoft.

Learning Activity

In Unit 2, the Learning Activity requires viewing a video and accompanying materials.  The video’s detailed record is linked to below.  Click “Launch” after opening the link to stream the video.  You can also download the video and accompanying PowerPoint and other files by clicking the download link after launching the video (this option looks like an arrow pointing downward).

• Edge Training Systems. (2007). Problem solving and decision making: Achieving desired results [Video]. Skillsoft.

Unit 2 Discussion

Subscribe

Topic 1: Planning for Business Success Using Problem-Solving Models, Integrative Thinking

Please review the Discussion Board participation grading rubric. This is important information that will ensure that you earn maximum points. Your professionally written APA-compliant postings, using appropriate sources, should provide substantive depth that advances the discussion. Please edit your posts for grammatical errors before you post. Be sure to review the requirements for each week’s discussion topic(s). Remember that a post to the instructor is not considered a post to peers, so please be sure that you respond to at least two peers for full credit.

Access all required readings (articles, videos, etc.) from the library.

In your first week of the team business simulation, you have started making decisions on the simulation by organizing the firm. This first quarter sets up the foundation for the rest of the game and will require integrated thinking skills if you are to be successful.

In your Reading for this week, you learned about integrative thinking in Riel and Martin (2014), “The Opposable Mind: How Successful Leaders Win through Integrative Thinking.” You have also learned about the Balanced Scorecard, a version of which is used to evaluate performance in the Marketplace simulation. You will also be completing the workshop “Problem Solving and Decision Making: Achieving Desired Results” in the Learning Activity. In this discussion, respond to the following:

[Order Now]

Main post

• Select a problem that you are currently facing. This could be a personal, professional, or class team-related problem. Walk through how you could be solving it effectively using Steps 1–5 of the 6-step problem-solving model found in the “Problem Solving and Decision Making: Achieving Desired Results” workshop. Explain how you would incorporate Step 6, Follow Up & Evaluate Progress.
• Identify the elements of integrative thinking from the Riel and Martin reading that would be helpful to you as you work through the problem you have selected.
• If applicable, discuss how your readings and research provide tools to help you work with others in this problem-solving effort.

Example Responses to Peers to Increase Discussion Success

• Ask why your peer chose the problem submitted with the main post.
• Share experiences of similar problems and how you solved them.
• Provide additional resources to help in the problem-solving.

GB500 Evaluation of Business Perspectives Discussion

RUBRIC Excellent Quality 95-100%   Introduction 45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Literature Support 91-84  points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Methodology 58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. Average Score 50-85% 40-38 points More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. 83-76  points There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. 52-49  points The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Poor Quality 0-45% 37-1 points The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. 75-1 points There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. 48-1 points There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. GB500 Evaluation of Business Perspectives Discussion Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

GB500 Evaluation of Business Perspectives Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!