Order Number |
65363737383 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY/DISERTATION |
Writer Level |
PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED |
Format |
APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD |
Academic Sources |
10 -20 |
Page Count |
4-8 PAGES |
Forces and Vectors
The following structure should be followed for all reports: I. Cover Page II. Introduction III. Theory IV. Method of Investigation V. Presentation of Data VI. All The Calculations VII. Analysis of Data VIII. Answers to Questions IX. Experiment Sheets X. Work Cited Page The sections should contain the following II. Introduction Should consist of a paragraph setting forth the technical objectives of the experiment from your own words. III. Theory Should include a discussion of the theory pertinent to the experiment, drawing of the experiment setup, and an outline of the experiment procedure in the student’s own words. IV. Method of Investigation Should list every item of equipment used, including the manufacturer’s name and model number and step by step procedure followed to obtain the data. V. Presentation of Data Should include a neat copy of the following: All measured values, in tabular form. All computed values, in tabular form. All graphs. All waveforms All tables and graphs should be numbered for reference purposes VI. Calculations Should include all calculation made in the experiment and the report. VII. Analysis of Data Should include a discussion of the following points: How valid are the data? What came out as expected, what went wrong and why? What are the probable sources of error if the discrepancies are excessive? What are the probable magnitudes of the different errors? How could the errors have been reduced? Only deviations greater than 10% need to be explained. VIII. Answers to Questions Any questions on the experiment sheets should be answered here. Any reference to data in another section should be by section number and page number. XI. Work Cited Page All source material consulted in writing the report should be listed in this section. Material quoted directly should be indicated with quotation marks and identified with regard to source by footnote. If material is quoted without proper credit given, a grade of zero may result.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/