Focus on Socialization and Cell Phones Discussion

Order Number

Type of Project

ESSAY

Writer Level

PHD VERIFIED

Format

APA

Academic Sources

10

Page Count

3-12 PAGES

Pease read each question carefully. Choose 1 of the 2 questions and answer it completely.

You must submit one file (preferably Word) via Brightspace. You submit under the Assignments Icon and submit via the Midterm icon. In subject heading state the question you will be answering. The question you answer is worth 100 points. Only answer 1 question. There are no extra points given if you answer two.

Question One: Cooley Identity Meme and emoji

Explain Cooley’s Looking Glass Self using emojis. (Make sure the emojis appear in your response). Next translate what these emojis represent to you and explain why they illustrate Cooley’s theory. (30 points)

Next, copy and paste 3 Memes you use most frequently that you feel represent your identity. Explain what you feel they communicate about your identity? (15 points)

Next ask 5 of your friends and family to describe your identity using 3 Memes. Paste the images you receive in your response and describe what they mean. (15 points)

Now compare the memes. Do they reflect similar ideas found in the Memes you used to describe yourself? Do your friends’ perception of you match your perception of self? (20 points)

Does your Meme data support Cooley’s theory? Explain your answer by describing specifically what parts of the theory are confirmed or not confirmed by your data. (20 points)

Question Two: Focus on Socialization and Cell Phones

Explain /Define the process of Socialization. (10 points)

Define what an agent of Socialization is. Explain how the four agents of socialization fulfill their function. (20 points)

Choose 2 of the 4 agents of socialization that you feel have been most significant to you in the socialization process. Name each and estimate how many hours a day you spend in contact with these agents. Describe specifically how they taught you who and how to be. For the 2 agents, name and explain 2 values/beliefs/perspectives (how to be) you were taught and 2 aspects of your identity(who) that was learned. (15 points)

Think about how you interact with the agents of socialization through your phone. Describe phone use. State how much of your day you spend in your screen time. How many hours a day do you work versus spend using your phone (look at your screen time report on phone). Describe how much time is used in entertainment, productivity and social. (10 points)

[Order Now]

Try not to use screens (phones, computers, smartwatches, tablets) for one hour (this hour is outside of time sleeping or work). How long were you able to be without a screen? What were the feelings of being without a screen? Why did you want to use your phone? What was the first thing you looked at when you picked up phone? Who was the person you connected with? What agent of socialization does this person represent? (15 points)

Think about the emotional response you had without your device and how you felt when you picked the phone up. Now connect to Cooley (Identity formed by others reflecting to us who we are). Did you feel more secure, safe, content, affirmed in who you are when allowed unrestricted access to phone? Describe the experience and explain if you feel the expe

95-100%

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

91-84  points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

50-85%

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

0-45%

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.