Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Weekly Reading Response papers (RR) (24 points)
The response papers should include a synthesis of the key points in the readings and a critical gendered/ sociological analysis of the material.Do not just summarize.
you must write a minimum of 2500 words in this course. This will be accomplished through various assignments, including reading response papers, artifact presentation, final paper or exam, and a storytelling assignment. In this paper, you must critically review and reflect on all of the assigned readings, course work, such as website, video, etc.
Failure to submit a response will receive a zero.The total of all response papers is 24 points of your grade.Remember this is NOT a last-minute assignment.The first RR is mandatory.The final three RR’s are worth 6 points each. The RR assignment is worth more than any other assignment. Please be aware that not completing the RR will mean not passing the class. Once the week is completed, there are no make-up opportunities for the RR. This class no longer requires a midterm or final. Therefore, the writing in your RR is vital to show me you are understanding gender theories, perspectives and course materials.
There are 5 weeks of RR papers.All students must complete week one to get up to speed and receive feedback. If you work hard for the first RR, you will be assured full credit. You may skip one RR without penalty.
To receive credit, your response papers must demonstrate thoughtful consideration of ALL the readings, websites, and/or films assigned in relationship to issues in the course and demonstrate to me that you read all the readings assigned. Follow these guidelines.
1 -2 points will demonstrate minimal effort.
3 points will demonstrate moderate effort and minimal sociological understanding.
4 points includes all the above, deeper sociological connections, all the assignment work and include connections to past/other readings,
5 points will also include all the above and a final paragraph making specific sociological connections.
6 points will include all the above and these two additional questions answered:
CLASS ZOOM TRANSCRIPT IS BELOW
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/