Facebook Metaverse Case Study Questions

November 30, 2022

Facebook Metaverse Case Study Questions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Facebook Metaverse Case Study Questions

[Order Now]

Article: https://www.wsj.com/articles/mark-zuckerberg-sets-…

Facebook Metaverse Case Study Questions

Question 1

“The experiences the company will introduce as it creates the metaverse should lure and excite such audiences but realizing that vision will be neither fast nor cheap. Analysts say some of the fundamental building blocks for the metaverse don’t exist, yet, and will take time to build. “We see the full vision of the metaverse as decades away,” Jefferies analysts said, even as they expressed a bullish (belief that it a good investment) outlook for the concept.”

In the excerpt above what advantage does Meta (Facebook) seek to gain by heavily investing in the newly emerging market for a “metaverse”? How could Facebook being a first entrant to the space impact the market and competitors in the future?

Question 2

How much is Facebook planning to invest in its efforts to develop the metaverse? Why?

Question 3

If Facebook makes the investments mentioned in the article “Meta Product Development” would become almost 30% of its total expenses. As a Procurement manager identify the purchase types of each item below and also its quadrant of the Kraljic Matrix and why?

Items	Purchase Type	Kraljic Matrix Category	Explanation of Category
Network Servers
Software Developers
Personal Computing Equipment for New Staff
Product Development Software

Question 4

What business and revenue opportunities for the metaverse are mentioned in the article?

[Order Now]

Question 5

Describe at least one business or revenue opportunity that you can think of for the metaverse that’s not mentioned in the article.

Question 6

What are your thoughts on the Metaverse overall, do you like the concept? Do you think it will be a major part of the future or just a trend? (No wrong or right answers on this one)

Facebook Metaverse Case Study Questions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.