EXPOSITORY EXEMPLIFICATION RESEARCH ESSAY ON DISCRIMINATION

December 20, 2022

EXPOSITORY EXEMPLIFICATION RESEARCH ESSAY ON DISCRIMINATION

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

EXPOSITORY EXEMPLIFICATION RESEARCH ESSAY ON DISCRIMINATION

Description

UNIT 1 – EXPOSITORY EXEMPLIFICATION RESEARCH ESSAY ON DISCRIMINATION

Read the selections. For each article/essay, find THREE examples of how the author experienced discrimination. Mandatory readings: “What’s in a Name?” “Just Walk on by: A Black Man Ponders his Power to Alter Public Space” by Brent Staples “The Myth of the Latin Woman: I Just Met a Girl Named Maria” by Judith Ortiz Cofer “Is Discussing Hijab Off Limits? Overcoming Sexualizing Muslim Women”by Umm Zakiyyah ——————————————————————————————————————————————

The introduction should start with an interesting statement, fact, definition, quote, or question to grab the reader’s attention (HOOK). Next, you should have a brief historical overview of discrimination in America. You will research facts to show how events and laws developed in hopes of ending and preventing discrimination. You MUST use MLA in-text citations to give credit to the sources of these facts whether they are paraphrased or quoted. No more than one quote per paragraph in your essay! There should be a transition sentence that will connect this history to the idea that minority authors have expressed their experiences and frustrations with discrimination in their literary works. The last sentence should be your thesis statement where you state that minority authors have exemplified their experiences with discrimination in their writing/literary works. You should state the names of the authors in the order that they will appear in your body paragraphs. —————————————————————————————————————————————–

In the body paragraphs, you must state the title of the reading selection and the author’s name. The examples in the body paragraphs must include: the discriminatory act/event how the author felt as a result how the author reacted/responded to this experience Each body paragraph should end with a transition sentence that leads the reader to the next paragraph. —————————————————————————————————————————————–

The conclusion should restate the thesis statement in different words. Follow it with a brief summary of the evidence provided in the body. End the paper with a concluding sentence which highlights the importance of this topic, hopes for the future, or a quote. ——————————————————————————————————————————————

Make sure the ENTIRE PAPER IS WRITTEN IN THIRD PERSON! This is a research essay that should use formal language. Avoid contractions, slang, or informal words or phrases. All sources must be cited in the essay using MLA in-text citations. The last page of your paper should be the Works Cited page which lists, in alphabetical order, the sources you used. Please refer to MLA 8th edition guidelines

EXPOSITORY EXEMPLIFICATION RESEARCH ESSAY ON DISCRIMINATION

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.