Exploring the "Man Box" Research Discussion Responses

November 26, 2022

Exploring the “Man Box” Research Discussion Responses

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Exploring the “Man Box” Research Discussion Responses

[Order Now]

Exploring, Man, Box, Research, Discussion, Responses

well to know if an article or book is credible it would be considered a scholarly (peer reviewed). This contains articles that have been reviewed then critiqued by people in the related field. That way readers can have the confidence that what they are reading holds up to some kind of creditability. Ways that I can check if it is credible is If I turn to the editorial policy page and check if the editors state that the journal contains peer reviewed articles. Or I can just use Kean data bases to be extra sure. I am not sure how to post an article?

My topic will be about exploring the “Man Box” and cause and effect of toxic masculinity. The Journal I am referencing too is called toxic masculinity and mental health by Angelique Jenney Journal. Three features that suggest it is peer viewed is: the title has the word journal in it. Secondly its start with a title abstract. Lastly, because their vocabulary and terms they used. For example, the journal never said boys, kids, teen, guys. They used terms such as Men and young Men.

In order to know if an article or book is a credible or peer-reviewed academic source, it would be descried as scholarly. The following are features or elements of an article or book one can use to evaluate whether or not it is credible: a “doi,” an abstract, a method section, does the author have a PhD?

My topic is regarding racism and colorism, specifically in the western world. The article posted, related to my topic is an example of a peer-reviewed article because it has an abstract, it was posted by the Society for the Psychological studies of Social Issues, and it has a “doi.”

In order to know if an article is peer-reviewed or from an academic source it must contains critics from experts related to the field. Another aspect that we can closely analyze is the tittle; if it contains academic words on its tittle, we can definitively say it is credible.

For instance, my topic is in the meteorology field; they are multiple authors for this article and its title is ” Examination of Nudging Schemes in the Simulation of Meteorology for Use in Air Quality Experiments: Application in the Great Lakes Region”, with this title is more than evident that it is a credible and reliable research. Moreover, this article contains an abstract; which makes it even more reliable.

Determining whether an article or book is a credible / a scholarly source has a lot of factors in my opinion. In my opinion, whatever topic you are researching and whatever sources you are using needs experts in the field. Anyone can give their input, but someone who is credible and an expert in the matter at hand contains more credibility.

Another thing I look for is the references and resources used to generate the article / book. And finally, looking further into the author and title of the book / article. Further researching the author can show more background information and allow for more credibility. The title should also be relevant to the topic at hand.

To know if an article or book is a credible peer-reviewed academic source is if it would be considered a scholarly. Scholarly or peer reviewed sources most likely has to have people who are directly in the field of the topic. it would be very difficult to talk about something you don’t really know about.

A scholarly article always starts off with an abstract that talks about what the article will consist of and at the end of the abstract are the key words which are in bold. Another thing that can help credibility is further research of the author. Searching to see what the author has done in the past has built credibility for them. Sources are also key as they have to be done properly as they have to be up to date.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Exploring the “Man Box” Research Discussion Responses

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.