Explain and Evaluate the Issue

December 21, 2022

Explain and Evaluate the Issue

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Explain and Evaluate the Issue

[Order Now]

An issue paper is an informative and focused piece that aims to persuade the reader to follow a specific course of action. Consider the following four parts.

Explain and Evaluate the Issue

Describe the issue and explain why it needs immediate attention. Explain the impact it has on social, economic, or/and political life of a country? Why is the current approach toward the issue improper or failing? Or, why is the issue not confronted at all?

The Historical Background

Identify the main causes behind the issue and place them in historical context. Reflect on key historical trajectories that help us better understand the state of the issue. Compare historical trajectories across different contexts and show how they inform different policy choices or approaches.

Alternative Approaches

Discuss alternative approaches to deal with the issue (compared to the one already adopted by the country), and their impact these alternative approaches might have in the society. Elaborate on the objectives, costs, and benefits of each alternative approach. Ideally, discuss at least two alternative approaches.

Plan of Action with Recommendations

Issue papers should recommend a clear plan of action with recommendation to address the issue. This plan could be a very specific one or something that combines parts from alternative approaches. It needs discuss the necessary changes that must occur, the actors needed to perform change, and the details of the change process. For example, what needs to change right now in regard to immigration? What must happen? How would that process look like?

Requirements

Length: 4-5 pages long, double space, Times New Roman, 12 pt. 1-inch margin.
No Cover Page.
Citations: Any citation style – just remain consistent throughout.
Submit through Canvas ONLY. No late submissions will be accepted.
Plagiarism is using someone else’s words or ideas and claiming them as your own. You MUST cite and give credit where is due. Anyone caught plagiarizing will receive no credit for the assignment and may be reported to the relevant college authority.

Issues/Topics

You MUST write your paper on ONE of the following issues

Abortion: To what extent should government be involved in regulating abortion?
Immigration: What should the government do regarding illegal immigration?
Gun Control: To what extent should the government prohibit or regulate the ownership of guns?
Economy/Society: Are Trump policies (economic, social) making America stronger or weaker?
Climate Change: What (if anything) should the United States do about climate change?
Foreign Threats: How should the U.S. respond to a) Russia’s aggression in Ukraine, or b) Chinese rivalry in the world stage, or c) North Korea nuclear threats?

[Order Now]

Explain and Evaluate the Issue

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.